Nothing neutral about net neutrality

← return to Water Cooler

So called “net neutrality” has been a buzz word among those on the left for several years since the internet has proven to be the private sector’s biggest success stories.  However, where there is money to be made there is government waiting around the corner, and net neutrality is just another example of government mandated control of the private sector and further redistribution of wealth.  Anyone who  supports net neutrality on the basis of fairness is simply fooling themselves.

Similar to a government takeover of the healthcare industry, so-called net neutrality is essentially a government take over of internet service providers(ISP’s).  Stifling private investment into new technology which could only improve broadband and communication infrastructure.  Unfortunately, government’s heavy if not upper hand takes away any incentive for the private sector to compete.  

What about content? Sam Batkins, policy director at the Center for individual Freedom told the Washington Times,: 

“One concern is if the federal government essentially regulates what internet providers can do with their traffic, then the government can regulate on the issue of policy as well.  If you give federal government control over internet service providers and what they can and can’t allow regarding traffic, they’ll have power over content as well.”

Net Neutrality has gone from a liberal rallying cry to real legislation on the hill.  Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Anna Eshoo (D - Calif.) have already crafted a Net Neutrality legislation bill. 

← return to Water Cooler

About the Author
Kerry Picket

Kerry Picket

Kerry Picket, a former Opinion Blogger/Editor of The Watercooler, was associate producer for the Media Research Center, a content producer for Robin Quivers of "The Howard Stern Show" on Sirius satellite radio and a production assistant and copy writer at MTV.

Latest Stories

Latest Blog Entries

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Illustration by Greg Groesch/The Washington Times

    LAMBRO: Skirting the lane-closure issue

  • Illustration by Linas Garsys/The Washington Times

    LYONS: Benghazi demands a select committee in Congress

  • Happening Now