Stupak sells out pro-life movement

← return to Water Cooler

Congressman Bart Stupak, a Michigan Democrat, told reporters Sunday: “Make no doubt about it. There will be no public funds for abortion,” as he attempted to explain why he chose to support the health care bill after striking a deal with the White House. Mr. Stupak and his cadre of self-proclaimed “pro-life” Democrats defended the Executive Order that Mr. Obama agreed to sign after the passage of the bill.  Mr. Stupak believes the order reasserts the intentions of the Hyde Amendment, a provision that prohibits the federal funding of abortion.

I asked Mr. Stupak how he could possibly assure pro-life individuals that this flimsy solution to gain his favor on the bill will not be immediately rescinded after the legislation is passed. The Michigan Democrat responded, “The president didn’t sign it to rip it up tomorrow.” 

Pro-life conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly points out that Mr. Stupak is naively trusting that the president will not immediately rescind the Executive Order. She writes:

“Perhaps Mr. Stupak and his fellow pro-life Democrats forget that President Obama’s first Executive Order was the repeal of the Mexico City Policy to allow for international funding of abortion.

“Not only would an Executive Order be rendered meaningless in the face of Congress passing legislation, which actively provides for the massive expansion and funding of abortion services, but anyone who doubts the abortion tsunami which awaits this bill becoming law lives in a fantasy world.

Barack Obama has lined every existing federal agency with the most dedicated pro-abortion ideologues, and we know that he will continue this pattern of pro-abortion appointments when it comes time for him to fill the over-100 bureaucracies created to administer his socialized health care program.”

The National Right to Life Committee excoriated the idea that an Executive Order would keep federal tax dollars from funding abortion:

“The order does nothing at all to mitigate the other abortion-related problems described in the NRLC letter, dealing with bill provisions that create dangerous regulatory mandate authorities, revise Indian health programs, and create pools of directly appropriated funds that are not covered by existing restrictions on funding of abortion.  Nor can the order correct the omission from the pending legislation of the necessary conscience-protection language that had been included in House-passed health care legislation last November (the ‘Weldon language’).”

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops remain opposed to the bill despite the Executive Order:

“According to these rulings, such health legislation creates a statutory requirement for abortion funding, unless Congress clearly forbids such funding.  That is why the Hyde amendment was needed in 1976, to stop Medicaid from funding 300,000 abortions a year.  The statutory mandate construed by the courts would override any executive order or regulation. “

Any alliances Mr. Stupak made among conservatives in the pro-life movement was shattered Sunday, as GOP pro-life congressmen responded to Mr. Stupak’s support of the health care bill. Congressman Mike Pence, an Indiana Republican said:

“You traded 30 years of pro-life law for a promise from the most pro-abortion president in history.”

Pro-choice advocates did not waste any time whatsoever to start pressuring Mr. Obama. Hotline reports:

“President Obama campaigned as a pro-choice president, but his actions today suggest that his commitment to reproductive health care is shaky at best,” NOW President Terry O’Neill wrote in a statement. “Contrary to language in the draft of the executive order and repeated assertions in the news, the Hyde Amendment is not settled law. … The message we have received today is that it is acceptable to negotiate health care on the backs of women, and we couldn’t disagree more.”

Whatever Mr. Stupak thinks his principles may be, pro-life advocates are not buying it. Mr. Stupak will always be known as a self-proclaimed pro-lifer who stabbed the life movement in the back. It is a shame conservatives did not fully see this before. The video below of Mr. Stupak is from an early town hall meeting where he told constituents he would vote for the health care bill regardless of the language. 
Mr. Stupak only showed pro-life individuals he is more concerned with promoting the Obama administration’s liberal agenda than life issues, and no lame Executive Order from the president will ever change that.


← return to Water Cooler

About the Author
Kerry Picket

Kerry Picket

Kerry Picket, a former Opinion Blogger/Editor of The Watercooler, was associate producer for the Media Research Center, a content producer for Robin Quivers of "The Howard Stern Show" on Sirius satellite radio and a production assistant and copy writer at MTV.

Latest Stories

Latest Blog Entries

blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Illustration by Greg Groesch/The Washington Times

    LAMBRO: Skirting the lane-closure issue

  • Illustration by Linas Garsys/The Washington Times

    LYONS: Benghazi demands a select committee in Congress

  • Happening Now