You are currently viewing the printable version of this entry, to return to the normal page, please click here.

Gay Republicans on Supreme Court marriage rulings: 'We're not done yet'

← return to Water Cooler

“Today’s ruling is a victory of conservative principles and admonishment of government overreach,” says Gregory T. Angelo, executive director of the Log Cabin Republicans, the nation’s largest Republican organization for gay conservatives and their allies, following the U.S. Supreme Court’s concurrent rulings on the Federal Defense of Marriage Act and Proposition 8.

“Civil marriage strengthens families, supports stability, and allows greater opportunity for couples to live without the crutch of government assistance, and now with Section 3 of DOMA rightly relegated to the dustbin of history, same-sex couples in civil marriage partnerships in those states that allow it can engage in the full spectrum of federal rights previously denied them,” Mr. Angelo continues.

“Now the fight continues in the states, and Log Cabin Republicans will continue to be on the front lines to take the conservative case for marriage to Republicans across the nation. History is on our side, and the wind is at our backs. We’re not done yet - not by a long shot,” he adds.

And some thoughts on it all from the Judicial Crisis Network’s Carrie Severino:

On DOMA:

“The majority’s reasoning today, as Justice Scalia put it, ‘is an assertion of judicial supremacy over the people’s representatives in Congress.’ However, there is a very thin silver lining; we are all federalists now. Just thirty years ago it would have been wild to suggest that a solid majority of the justices, in two major cases concerning a heated cultural issue, would affirm the idea that the most important decisions about social policy in this country should be made at the state level, by the people and their elected officials,” Ms. Severino says.

“The bottom line is that same-sex marriage advocates ran to the Supreme Court hoping the justices would invent a nationwide right to gay marriage, and they lost. Instead, the justices have embraced principles of federalism and said that this issue will be decided by the people and their elected representatives at the state level.”

And on Prop 8:

“While this result is certainly disappointing for those who hoped for a final ruling today, it affirms the fundamental constitutional principle of limited government - including the limited authority of the courts to decide cases. The bottom line is that same-sex marriage advocates ran to the Supreme Court hoping the justices would invent a nationwide right to gay marriage, and they lost,” she says.

This contentious policy issue is one that properly should be decided at the local level by the people and their elected officials, not by five unelected judges,” Ms. Severino concludes.

← return to Water Cooler

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Illustration by Greg Groesch/The Washington Times

    LAMBRO: Skirting the lane-closure issue

  • Illustration by Linas Garsys/The Washington Times

    LYONS: Benghazi demands a select committee in Congress

  • Happening Now