Hail the Big Gulp: 69 percent of Americans reject Bloomberg's drink ban

← return to Water Cooler

Lift those 16-ounce glasses high? There is not a single demographic in the nation that agrees with New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s proposed ban on big drinks in his town. It is something that all ethnicities, political parties and income brackets agree on.

“Americans, by 69 percent to 30 percent, say they would vote against a law that limits the size of soft drinks and other sugary beverages served in restaurants to no more than 16 ounces,” reports a Gallup poll released Wednesday.

Naturally, Republicans have stronger feelings, though: 78 percent would vote down the ban, along with 71 percent of independents and 62 percent of Democrats. Three fourths of conservatives, 70 percent of moderates and 57 percent of liberals agree, along with 75 percent of “non-Hispanic whites” and 57 percent of “nonwhites,” Gallup found.

Mr. Bloomberg’s administration is appealing a lower-court ruling made in March that struck down his proposed limit on sweet beverages in the city’s restaurants. The judge ruled it would unfairly apply to only select retailers.

The mayor insists the measure would help reduce diabetes and obesity rates, while critics counter it epitomizes nanny-style government. Indeed, the we fret about getting fat. But we fear loss of daily freedom more.

“Americans may think that limiting the size of beverages may be too much of a government encroachment into individual freedom, and the choice of beverage size should be left to consumers and businesses, not the government,” says Gallup analyst Alyssa Brown.

“This would be consistent with Gallup’s finding that more than half of Americans still say the government is trying to do too many things that should be left to individuals and businesses.”

← return to Water Cooler

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Illustration by Greg Groesch/The Washington Times

    LAMBRO: Skirting the lane-closure issue

  • Illustration by Linas Garsys/The Washington Times

    LYONS: Benghazi demands a select committee in Congress

  • Happening Now