

NEW YORK — France and other opponents of the war in Iraq gave a tepid response yesterday to a Bush administration request at the United Nations for additional troops.
Two days after a suicide truck bomber destroyed the U.N. headquarters in Baghdad, killing at least 23 persons, Secretary of State Colin L. Powell met U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan to discuss a new Security Council resolution.
The United States is seeking passage of a resolution that would make it easier for nations such as India, Turkey and Pakistan to contribute troops — under the U.S. command — to the American-led multinational force in Iraq.
“I think anybody making the contribution, a military contribution, sending their young men and women into harm’s way, want them to be under solid, responsible, competent military leadership of the kind that is being provided by the coalition and the military component of the coalition,” Mr. Powell said.
France, which led opposition to the war in the United Nations, responded by chiding the United States for failing to build a “genuine” international partnership.
Iraq’s reconstruction requires “the joint mobilization of the entire international community,” French Ambassador Michel Duclos said.
“But that is only possible if the Coalition Provisional Authority acknowledges they could not succeed alone,” he said, using the name for the U.S.-led administration in Iraq.
Mr. Duclos said that coalition authorities should permit the return of U.N. weapons inspectors to search for weapons of mass destruction, and that the coalition should cooperate more actively with noncoalition members.
“To share the burden and the responsibilities in a world of equal and sovereign nations also means sharing information and authority,” Mr. Duclos said.
Mr. Annan, clearly grieving after Tuesday’s attack on the U.N. compound in Baghdad, indicated he could endorse the U.S. effort.
“We all realize that it is urgent to help bring peace to Iraq, bring peace to the region,” he said. “An Iraq that is destabilized, an Iraq that is in chaos, is not in the interest of the region or the world. And we do have a responsibility to ensure this.”
Some 86 persons remained hospitalized after the suicide bombing, and the United Nations announced yesterday it would pull about 100 staffers out of Iraq, reducing its force to 200 essential personnel.
Other council members sided with France and did not share Mr. Annan’s enthusiasm for a new U.N. resolution.
China, Russia and Pakistan said the responsibility to provide security in Iraq — to international and private organizations, and to the Iraqis themselves — rests with the U.S.-led coalition.
View Entire StoryBy H. Leighton Steward
Fantasy replaces reality in Obama's green economy

By Meredith Somers - The Washington Times
Prosecutors in their closing arguments on Saturday portrayed George W. Huguely V as a hulking ...

By Nekesa Mumbi - Associated Press
Clapping hands and swaying to gospel hymns in the church where Whitney Houston’s powerful voice ...

By George Jahn - Associated Press
Iran is poised to greatly expand uranium enrichment at a fortified underground bunker to a ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

First over-the-counter column approved for fast and effective relief from even your worst media-induced headache.

History doesn't have to be grim; there is a lot to be learned from the pages of time.