- Beretta leaves Maryland over gun laws, heads for Tennessee
- Neal Boortz defends Hillary Clinton for representing child rapist
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Top federal judge uses pizza to explain complex Obamacare situation
- Obama, Biden overhaul job training programs
- Drought-plagued Californians turn to paint to keep lawns green
- ISIL now forcing Iraqi shopkeepers to veil mannequins in Mosul
- 11 parents of Nigeria’s abducted girls die
- Genetic mapping triggers new hope on schizophrenia
- Turkish P.M. Erdogan won’t speak to Obama, but he’ll take calls from Biden
108 nations decline to pursue terrorists
Question of the Day
NEW YORK — A U.N. monitoring committee complained yesterday that 108 nations have failed to file required reports on their actions in the war against terrorism, such as freezing assets and reporting the names of suspected terrorists.
Frustrated committee members said they are considering asking for a stronger Security Council resolution with “more teeth” to force compliance from member states.
The reports are required under Security Council resolutions passed since 2001, which imposed sanctions first on the Taliban and later on al Qaeda and the 30 to 40 terrorist groups thought to be affiliated with them.
Governments are required to enumerate steps that they have taken to make banking records more transparent, identify terrorist suspects and halt shipments of weapons and potentially dangerous chemicals.
Michael Chandler, chairman of the monitoring group, said he would not make excuses for nations that have been slow to file the comprehensive reports, which were due by the end of October.
Among the countries that have not complied are several where the al Qaeda terror network is thought to be active, including Afghanistan, Egypt, Indonesia, Kenya and Sudan.
“There is a stigma, I think, as though countries are reluctant to admit there is al Qaeda activity or connections inside their borders,” Mr. Chandler said, suggesting that such admissions would scare away tourism and investment.
“We were surprised to see in some of these [reports] not as much information about the presence of al Qaeda as we would have expected.”
Chilean Ambassador Heraldo Munoz, chairman of the United Nations’ al Qaeda sanctions committee, said, “I’m still hopeful we’ll have more cooperation” by the end of the year.
“I think we’ll have to cooperate on a stronger resolution, give more teeth to the sanctions,” he added.
Those sanctions imposed by the U.N. resolutions call for all member countries to freeze the assets, confiscate the properties and businesses, and ban travel by suspected terrorists.
The resolutions also demand that governments shut down charities that claim to collect money for relief and investment for the Islamic poor, but in fact subsidize violent efforts.
The United States, which has met most of its reporting requirements, yesterday questioned the need for a stronger counterterrorism resolution.
“What [Mr. Munoz] means to say is that member states are not complying with the resolution, and we say, ‘Hear, hear,’” said Richard Grenell, spokesman for U.N. Ambassador John D. Negroponte. “The resolution is just fine.”
The president could pay the full price for ignoring Congress
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- D.C. appeals panel deals big blow to Obamacare subsidies
- 'Straight White Guy Festival' supposedly set for Ohio park
- Beretta moving to Tennessee over Maryland gun laws
- Gen. James Amos, Marine Corps commandant, slams Obama's handling of Iraq
- LYONS: Small-arms treaty, big Second Amendment threat
- Jewish woman booted from JetBlue flight over fight with Palestinian
- MAY: Barbarians at Jordan's gate
- Outrage over $190M border security deal for troubled federal contractor
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq