You are currently viewing the printable version of this article, to return to the normal page, please click here.
The Washington Times Online Edition

Mad cow case may give new life to meat legislation

Question of the Day

Who do you think, among the GOP presidential candidates, will raise the most funds?

View results

Legislation to keep meat from downed animals off American kitchen tables was scuttled -- for the second time in as many years -- as Congress labored unsuccessfully earlier this month to pass a catchall agency spending bill.

Now, in the wake of the apparent discovery of the first mad cow case in the United States, the author of the House version of the cattle provision wants to press the issue anew when Congress returns Jan. 20 from its winter recess. The massive, $373 billion spending bill covering several government agencies is still pending in the Senate.

"I said on the floor of the House that you will rue the day that because of the greed of the industry to make a few extra pennies from 130,000 head, the industry would sacrifice the safety of the American people," said Rep. Gary L. Ackerman, New York Democrat and the chief House sponsor. "It's so pound-foolish."

The provision dealing with downed cattle didn't make it into the compromise version of the legislation that House and Senate conference members brought before Congress.

The Agriculture Department estimates that 130,000 animals that are too injured or sick to stand or walk unassisted are slaughtered every year. About 36 million cows are slaughtered each year in the United States.

The provision, which started through the legislative process as an amendment to an agriculture spending bill, effectively would have prohibited the sale of livestock too sick or injured to stand or walk unassisted.

The agricultural spending bill passed -- with the provision intact -- on a Senate voice vote in November after failing by three votes in the House in July. But congressional negotiators did not include it in the broader, $373 billion omnibus spending bill that passed the House this month and is still awaiting a vote in the Senate.

Rep. Maurice D. Hinchey, New York Democrat and a negotiator who voted for the measure in the House, said Democrats never had a chance to fight for the proposal.

"The Republicans, the leadership, shut off the conference, they closed it down, and this is one of a number of provisions which were handled in a backroom deal without the Democrats there and with only the Republican leadership," Mr. Hinchey said.

Lawmakers and congressional aides said they consider it unlikely that Congress would reopen the multibillion-dollar bill to address the issue.

"I can't imagine that it would be," said Rep. Henry Bonilla, Texas Republican and opponent of the measure.

A day after the government announced the first apparent case of mad cow disease in the United States -- in a downed animal -- lawmakers and interest groups on both sides of the issue said they had been vindicated.

The Humane Society of the United States has warned repeatedly that if the meat from a lone cow with the brain-wasting disease found its way into the food supply, other countries would cut off U.S. beef imports and consumer confidence would be shaken.

"We are already seeing that play out," said Humane Society Vice President Wayne Pacelle. Japan, Taiwan and Mexico, the three largest importers, banned U.S. beef.

But opponents of the legislation said USDA inspectors might never have discovered the apparent presence of the disease, formally known as bovine spongiform encephalopathy, had Mr. Ackerman's legislation been in place.

Banning the sale of downed animals would prevent USDA inspectors from detecting cases of the disease because the animals would never reach the slaughterhouse for inspection, they said.

"The fact that it was caught is the significant thing for the consumer," said Rep. Charles W. Stenholm of Texas, the top Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee. Mr. Stenholm has argued that federal inspectors are in the best position to keep sick animals out of the food chain.

In the House, most Republicans as well as conservative and farm-state Democrats opposed the measure. Both chambers passed similar provisions in their versions of the 2002 farm bill, but negotiators stripped the measure from the final version of that bill.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Antonya Huntenburg, 21, of Hillsborough, N.J., a student at the Corcoran College of Art and Design, says everyone she knows is under some kind of economic pressure, including her parents. She says she joined the Occupy D.C. encampment on McPherson Square "to be safe." (Rod Lamkey Jr./The Washington Times)

    Youths show economic frustration in streets around the world

    By Patrice Hill - The Washington Times

  • **FILE** Chief Warrant Officer Charlie Morgan attends the OutServe Armed Forces Leadership Summit on Oct. 15, 2011, in Las Vegas. (Associated Press)

    Military gay group growing, aiming for more rights

    By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times

  • ** FILE ** The Rev. William E. Lori, Roman Catholic bishop of Bridgeport, Conn., gestures while testifying on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 16, 2012, before the House Oversight and Government Reform committee hearing: "Lines Crossed: Separation of Church and State. Has the Obama Administration Trampled on Freedom of Religion & Freedom of Conscience." From left are, Lori, the Rev. Dr. Matthew C. Harrison, president of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod, and C. Ben Mitchell, professor of Moral Philosophy Union University. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

    Battle lines are drawn over whether Obama is waging a war on religion

    By Cheryl Wetzstein - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities