Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

ACLU targets Navy

While many graduates of the U.S. Naval Academy have spent 2003 defending our nation in Iraq, in Afghanistan or on ships at sea, lawyers for the American Civil Liberties Union have been plotting an act of cultural terrorism against the Navy here at home.

The ACLU is targeting the voluntary lunchtime prayer that has been a tradition at the Naval Academy since its founding.

In the ACLUs view, consenting adults have a right to do just about anything they want except say grace in a government cafeteria. Consensual sodomy, it believes, is a sacred right, while consensual public prayer is a sorry ritual to be crushed beneath the boot heel of big government.

True to its creed, the ACLU began maneuvering against the Navy in April, after the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ordered the Virginia Military Institute to cancel its supper prayer.

Theoretically, VMI violated the First Amendment. “Congress,” it says, “shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” In essence, the judges concluded that when Virginia allowed its cadets to say a nondenominational prayer it was the equivalent of Congress establishing a federal religion in the very corner of Virginia where Stonewall Jackson used to teach.

Although absurd, the appeals court decision was the predictable progeny of a long line of abominable Supreme Court decisions. That court banned prayer in public grade schools and high schools. The appeals court merely extended the principle to a public college.

That gave the ACLU an opening to attack the Navy.

Maryland ACLU Director Susan Goering sent the academy a letter. “We believe that when you have had a chance to review the 4th Circuits opinion,” she said, “you will agree that the Naval Academys mandatory lunchtime prayer cannot pass constitutional muster, and will therefore cease the practice.”

Never mind that the prayer is not “mandatory.” What mattered was Miss Goerings implicit threat to sue. But the Navy did not retreat. In August, it announced it would keep its prayer, and the ACLU went ballistic.

“We tried things the nice way, and theyve told us to pound sand,” ACLU lawyer David Rocah told the Baltimore Sun. “If someone is interested in challenging” the prayer, he said, “we would be perfectly happy to talk to them about that.”

Republican Rep. Walter Jones of North Carolina did not sit idle at such threats. If the ACLU cant be stopped now, he told me, tomorrow it will “try to control what prayer is said in the foxhole.”

“I have seen the federal courts take one right after another away from people of faith in this country,” said Mr. Jones, “and I think its time to fight.”

He introduced legislation to codify the authority of the military academies to offer “voluntary, nondenominational prayer” at academy events. Designed to send an unsubtle signal to any court that entertains an ACLU suit against the Navy, the proposal is likely to be included in next years Defense authorization.

But will it stop a judge from banning the Navys prayer? I doubt it.

The same federal courts that declared same-sex sodomy a right and banned the Ten Commandments from state buildings will not be deterred by an ordinary act of Congress.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • **FILE** Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (Associated Press)

    Sanctions may be changing Iran’s nuke plans

    By Shaun Waterman - The Washington Times

  • David Wilmot, a power player in the District, is using a program to aid the economically disadvantaged to win contracts. (Barbara L. Salisbury/The Washington Times)

    Top D.C. lobbyist says he deserves special aid

    By Jeffrey Anderson - The Washington Times

  • Washington state Gov. Chris Gregoire is surrounded by legislators and others Monday as she signs into law a bill legalizing same-sex marriage. The law is to take effect June 7, but opponents are mounting a repeal effort. (Associated Press)

    Washington ballot best chance for foes of same-sex marriage

    By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          The Political Pro-Con

          Not your typical discussion, writer Conor Murphy writes about the cons, and pros, of politics

          A Heart Without Compromise; Advocating for Children

          Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.