

The Bush administration has drafted a U.N. resolution that authorizes deployment of a multinational force to Liberia and prepares the ground for U.S. participation, administration officials said yesterday.
The draft resolution, initially prepared by the State Department, was held up for several days because the Pentagon wanted to ensure that American peacekeepers would have immunity from the new International Criminal Court (ICC).
Differences over the specific language were resolved by yesterday morning, one senior administration official said.
“This is the kind of resolution we think we need for an American participation” in a Liberia force, said another senior official.
The text, which the United States would introduce in the U.N. Security Council if and when President Bush decides on sending American troops to the African nation, was prepared as part of the administration’s contingency planning, the second official said.
“It won’t be finalized and circulated in the council until the president has made a decision,” he said.
The first official said the United States “will be there in some capacity, but as the president indicated, any force will be limited in scope, not 20,000” troops.
A third administration official said the current version of the paragraph about immunity from the ICC — which Washington opposes — provides that Americans accused of crimes in Liberia could be tried only by U.S. courts.
The Security Council “decides that current or former officials or personnel from a contributing state shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the contributing state for any criminal proceedings, including arrests and investigations, arising out of acts or omissions related to the multinational force or U.N. stabilization force in Liberia, unless such exclusive jurisdiction has been waived by the contributing state,” the new text says.
The United States is not a member of the ICC, whose Rome statute went into effect a year ago. U.S. officials, fearful the court might prosecute Americans for political reasons, have negotiated bilateral agreements with more than 50 countries to exempt U.S. soldiers and officials from the court’s jurisdiction, but Liberia is not one of them.
The administration appeared yesterday not to have persuaded Congress that American troops, already serving in a number of places around the world, should now go to Liberia.
Lawmakers, briefed by Secretary of State Colin L. Powell in a closed-door session, said he did not sway many minds.
“I believe that we are stretched very thin, and that our military has its hands full in Afghanistan and Iraq. In my judgment we need to think long and hard before taking on another commitment,” said Sen. Susan Collins, Maine Republican.
“I don’t doubt that an international peacekeeping force would be helpful in Liberia, but at this point I question whether we need to take on that commitment and be the largest contributor of troops, which is what the plan appears to be,” she said.
View Entire StoryBy H. Leighton Steward
Fantasy replaces reality in Obama's green economy

By Tom Howell Jr. - The Washington Times
A 29-year-old Moroccan man was arrested Friday on accusations he planned to detonate a suicide ...

By David Hill - The Washington Times
The House voted Friday night to approve Gov. Martin O’Malley’s same-sex marriage bill, sending the ...

By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times
Acting with striking bipartisanship, Congress on Friday passed a full-year extension of the payroll tax ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

A collection of Entertainment News and Reviews from Washington, D.C. to the beyond

Not your typical discussion, writer Conor Murphy writes about the cons, and pros, of politics

Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.