- Article
- Comments ()
Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates last week called spam a "spreading plague," but the world's largest software maker has lobbied routinely against the toughest anti-spam legislation.
Some consumer groups said the Redmond, Wash., company is more interested in profiting from spam than stopping it.
Anti-spam groups said Microsoft has supported legislation that would legitimize spam as a marketing practice because it stands to profit from businesses that use e-mail to sell products. These groups also note that Microsoft profits from the deluge of spam by selling spam filters and extra e-mail storage.
"The notion that Microsoft is beating the drum for anti-spam is utterly fallacious," said David Kramer, a Palo Alto, Calif., lawyer who has helped craft anti-spam legislation.
About 40 percent of all e-mail is unsolicited, costing businesses as much as $10 billion a year in anti-spam services and lost productivity, the Federal Trade Commission says.
The Wall Street Journal published a letter June 23 from Mr. Gates, Microsoft's co-founder, titled "Why I Hate Spam." In it, he outlined efforts to partner with Yahoo, Earthlink and America Online to reduce spam, and to push for legislation and technology that would make it harder for spammers to use deceptive practices.
Microsoft posted a similar letter from Mr. Gates on its Web site Tuesday, a week after the company said it filed 13 lawsuits against spammers for deception and fraud.
Spam opponents called Mr. Gates' letters disingenuous and self-serving.
Mr. Kramer said the letter was part of a "cynical PR campaign" designed to increase sales of Microsoft anti-spam products.




Post a comment
There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.