Bush appellate judge picks being OK'd at typical pace

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

President Bush has seen more of his appeals court nominees confirmed by the Senate at this point in his term than any other president since at least the 1970s, despite Democratic filibusters against two nominees.

The Senate has confirmed 24 of Mr. Bush's appellate nominees in his first 29 months in office.

By comparison, the first President Bush saw 23 confirmed, and President Clinton saw 22 confirmed, at the same point in their presidencies.

Republicans say those numbers are misleading because Mr. Bush has nominated so many more judges than his predecessors because of both existing vacancies and recent expansion of the federal courts.

At the lower, district court level, Mr. Clinton had 122 judicial nominees confirmed in his first 29 months, and Mr. Bush has had 102 confirmed.

But it is with the appellate nominations, where considerably more power is at stake than with district judgeships, that senators wage the most intense ideological battles.

Both the Democratic filibusters are against nominees to appeals courts.

Though a majority of senators support the nominations of Texas Supreme Court Justice Priscilla Owen and Washington lawyer Miguel Estrada to appellate court positions, Democrats have mustered the 41 Senate votes needed to block final action on the Bush appointments.

Republicans charge that Democrats are obstructing the judicial-nomination process with "unprecedented" filibusters. As evidence against that accusation, Democrats have pointed to the rate of confirmations for Mr. Bush's nominees, which are comparable to recent administrations.