

The Pentagon announced yesterday it is sending a new, expanded team of inspectors to Iraq to solve the puzzle of whether ousted strongman Saddam Hussein harbored huge stocks of banned weapons or U.S. intelligence was wrong in saying he did.
Army Maj. Gen. Keith Dayton will head the Iraq Survey Team of some 1,400 American, British and Australian specialists.
The bigger team will replace the 75th Exploitation Task Force, a unit of several hundred that has not found chemical or biological weapons in inspecting 200 suspected weapons sites on a list of 900.
“Do I think we’re going to find something?” Gen. Dayton asked himself at a Pentagon news conference. “Yeah, I kind of do.
“This is not necessarily going to be quick and easy,” the Bush administration’s new chief weapons detective added, “but it will be very thorough.”
President Bush largely based his decision to invade Iraq and oust Saddam on the CIA’s assessment that Baghdad had weapons of mass destruction and that they could one day fall into the hands of murderous al Qaeda terrorists.
The allies’ failure to find such weapons seven weeks after Baghdad fell April 9 has stirred some Democrats and antiwar activists to charge that the president sent troops to war under false pretenses. British Prime Minister Tony Blair has come under similar attack at home.
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and other top U.S. officials counter that the search is still young. They say Saddam oversaw a complex deception program that is proving tough to crack.
Officials also say that all top Iraqi Ba’ath Party operatives in coalition custody are sticking to Baghdad’s assertion that all banned weapons were destroyed. Officials view this as a continuation of Saddam’s deception program.
Mr. Wolfowitz, a prime administration advocate of going to war, yesterday was the target of new criticism from antiwar activists in Europe over an interview he gave May 9 to Vanity Fair magazine.
In the lengthy interview, Mr. Wolfowitz explained the three main justifications for toppling Saddam, with weapons of mass destruction being the one issue all policy-makers agreed on in the internal debates.
“The truth is that for reasons that have a lot to do with the U.S. government bureaucracy, we settled on the one issue that everyone could agree on, which was weapons of mass destruction as the core reason,” he said, according to the Pentagon’s official transcript.
In the Vanity Fair article, the quote came out different: “For bureaucratic reasons, we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on.”
Asked about the quote yesterday during a visit to Singapore, Mr. Wolfowitz urged reporters to read the Pentagon’s transcript.
View Entire StoryBy H. Leighton Steward
Fantasy replaces reality in Obama's green economy

By Tom Howell Jr. - The Washington Times
A 29-year-old Moroccan man was arrested Friday on accusations he planned to detonate a suicide ...

By David Hill - The Washington Times
updated 26 minutes ago
The House voted Friday night to approve Gov. Martin O’Malley’s same-sex marriage bill, sending the ...

By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times
Acting with striking bipartisanship, Congress on Friday passed a full-year extension of the payroll tax ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

A collection of Entertainment News and Reviews from Washington, D.C. to the beyond

Not your typical discussion, writer Conor Murphy writes about the cons, and pros, of politics

Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.