Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

GOP ‘spending us silly’

The scene: A bright but modestkitchen, through the back door of which, right, the noontimesunis streaming. At kitchen counter stands Louise, a fit senior citizen of indeterminate age wearing an apron over a warm-up suit. She is chopping healthy salad ingredients.

Enter Harry,her trim husband of the same vague senior age, an athletic towel draped over the back of his neck, happily aglow following some unspecified exercise regimen, through the back door.

Two-shot as Harry enters. Louise, cheerfully: “Welcome back. The mail came.”

Harry wipes brow with towel as camera pans right, bringing kitchen table into view foreground. Harry: “Anything important?”

Cut to Louise, chopping: “A letter from your company about our retirement benefits.”

Pan right to two-shot as Harry picks up letter from kitchen table. Cut to close up as he reads, his cheery expression changing first to incomprehension then to stunned worry: “Oh no, Louise.”

Cut to two-shot. Louise: “What is it, Harry?”

Harry: “They’re dropping our prescription coverage. They say it’s because of what Congress has done to Medicare.”

Cut to Louise, who has stopped chopping. Louise: “But Harry, I thought Congress was supposed to be helping people to get prescription drug coverage.”

Cut to Harry staring ashenly at letter: “Well, it looks like Congress won’t let us keep ours.”

Cut to grainy black-and-white still photo of Capitol building. Voiceover: “Tell Congress: Fix Medicare, but don’t take away seniors’ choices on prescription drug plans.”

Ah, who can forget the heady days of 1994, when “Harry and Louise” took to the airwaves in a massive counterattack on the Clinton administration’s health care reform plans? The new Clinton administration, seeing itself as completing the mission of the New Deal, proposed a massive new entitlement program to guarantee all Americans health insurance coverage. A newly energized conservative minority in the GOP was galvanized by a small group of policy intellectuals, making the case that defeat of the initiative was both politically possible and essential to the health of the system itself.

The opposition was part of a wide-ranging conservative indictment of big-government, bureaucratic entitlement programs that neither solved the problems they were meant to address (welfare and poverty, for example, and public schools and education), or whose future unfunded liabilities threatened the country’s very solvency (Medicare, Social Security). This was the defining policy battle of the age.

Industry associations pitched in with money to fund the brilliant and notorious “Harry and Louise” campaign, in which the eponymous fictional characters discover that under the Clinton proposal, they may no longer be able to choose their doctor. The indictment of the plan was devastating. This, combined with political inexperience and miscalculation on the part of the new administration, led to the collapse of the proposal on Capitol Hill and contributed hugely to the election of a GOP House and Senate for the first time in 40 years.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • ** FILE ** Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich speaks during a news conference on Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

    Questions surface on Gingrich campaign travel payments

    By Luke Rosiak - The Washington Times

    updated 53 minutes ago

  • This artist rendering shows Amine El Khalifi before U.S. District Judge T. Rawles Jones Jr. in federal court in Alexandria, Va., Friday, Feb. 17, 2012. El Khalifi, a 29-year-old Moroccan man was arrested Friday near the U.S. Capitol as he was planning to detonate what he thought was a suicide vest, given to him by FBI undercover operatives, said police and government officials. (AP Photo/Dana Verkouteren)

    Terror suspect arrested near U.S. Capitol

    By Tom Howell Jr. - The Washington Times

  • Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Associated Press)

    Justice says Supreme Court should revisit campaign finance

    By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          The Political Pro-Con

          Not your typical discussion, writer Conor Murphy writes about the cons, and pros, of politics

          A Heart Without Compromise; Advocating for Children

          Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.