- Arkansas voter ID law struck down by state judge
- FDA proposes ban on e-cigarette sales to minors
- Bad omen? Italian man crushed to death by John Paul II crucifix
- Company stopped from accepting abortion waste
- Girl surprises Michelle Obama with unemployed dad’s resume
- ‘Harry Potter’ religion class seeks to enlighten students on ‘God, sin, and theodicy’
- ‘Optionally piloted’ Black Hawk helicopter clears tests; future missions to go ‘fully unmanned’
- Vice News reporter kidnapped in Ukraine is freed after being beaten, blindfolded
- FCC’s new ‘net neutrality’ proposal sparks outrage among consumer advocates
- Families of ferry’s lost confront South Korean officials
Gay ‘marriage’ opponents push civil-union bill
Opponents of same-sex “marriage” in Massachusetts are trying to counter last week’s landmark court ruling by persuading the legislature to enact a civil-union law instead, and by delaying the court’s decision from taking effect for long enough to amend the state constitution.
Homosexual rights groups, however, say they will work “hour by hour” to see that Massachusetts marriage licenses are issued to same-sex couples in May.
On Tuesday, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its decision that homosexual couples have a constitutional right to “marry.” The court stayed its ruling in Goodridge v. Department of Public Health for 180 days to allow for a legislative response.
Traditional-values groups decried the ruling as an assault on the nation’s bedrock social institution, the traditional family, and vowed to do everything they can to block it.
One opposition strategy being discussed is for the Massachusetts legislature to do what Vermont’s did in 2000 when faced with a court ruling on same-sex unions: craft a bill to legally provide the benefits, protections and rights of marriage to homosexual couples, without using the word “marriage.”
The Goodridge ruling calls for “basic fairness” for homosexual couples but is ambiguous about how the state should accomplish that mandate, Massachusetts Attorney General Tom Reilly said last week.
The legislature, not the courts, should be deciding how to make profound social changes, Mr. Reilly said Friday. The legislature, therefore, should take the “strong opportunity” of the next 180 days to produce a law offering marriagelike protections to homosexual couples, he said.
Another opposition strategy is to defer the matter until Massachusetts voters have a chance to speak.
Massachusetts was founded on the principle of self-government, so the high court would be “most consistent” with state history if it agreed to stay its ruling until the people can vote on the issue, said Wendy Baker of the Marriage Law Project at Columbus School of Law at Catholic University of America.
Traditional-values groups in Massachusetts already have gathered signatures and requested a constitutional convention. Lawmakers are set to meet on the matter on Feb. 11. The earliest time a public vote could be scheduled would be November 2006.
However, lawyer Mary Bonauto of Gay & Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD), who represented Julie and Hillary Goodridge, said Friday the plaintiffs’ legal victory will not be muddied or denied.
“The Supreme Judicial Court was clear that it is unconstitutional to deny these couples the right to marry, and it’s mean to play politics with people’s lives,” Miss Bonauto said. “It’s basic common sense that nothing short of or different from marriage can provide the same ‘protections, benefits and obligations’ of marriage.”
Miss Bonauto added that Mr. Reilly, whom she faced in court, was “just wrong” when he said “the legislature is the only proper place to sort out people’s civil rights.”
The attorney general “pressed that argument in court and lost,” she said.
By Tammy Bruce
Only IRS employees could expect rewards for failing to pay their taxes
- Holder cancels appearance in OKC amid angry protests
- In its hunt for Senate, Republican candidates campaign against Harry Reid
- 'Top Gun' for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy's approval
- Obamacare class-action suit opens a new legal front
- Opposition rising to Colorado gun control laws
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Nevada rancher's racial remarks cost him range of support
- Sold out: Ukraine's leadership swapped best military weapons for cash
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- Justice at last: 'Evil woman' outed for grabbing girl's game ball
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Celebrity deaths in 2014