The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Politics

    Voight, tea party groups plan last-minute protest

  • Politics

    CURL: Obama the Innocent stumps for health care

  • Politics

    Key Democrat Boccieri switches to 'yes' on health vote

  • Commentary

    TURNER: Our lawbreaking Congress

  • Energy

    Obama backs plan to legalize illegals

  • World

    Gitmo suspects allowed laptops while in custody

  • Politics

    Health-vote ally Nelson to get new VA hospital for Nebraska

Tuesday, September 16, 2003

California told to postpone recall

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Stories

  • Voight, tea party groups plan last-minute protest
  • Judge rejects settlement for 9/11 rescuers
  • URS, Minnesota settle suit over bridge collapse
  • Key Democrat Boccieri switches to 'yes' on health vote

By

A federal appeals court ruled yesterday that California must delay its recall election until several major counties upgrade their voting machines. An appeal is expected and the major candidates said they would continue to campaign as if the election were still on.

A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco said holding the election as scheduled Oct. 7 would result in a "hurried, constitutionally infirm election." The panel did not set a new date, but suggested the election be held in March, when the Democratic primary election is scheduled.

By then, the judges said, the six counties will have replaced obsolete punch-card voting machines. Without that, voters in those counties would be disenfranchised compared with voters in counties with better voting systems, which would violate the equal protection clause of the Constitution.

"The margin of victory could well be less than the margin of error in the use of punch-card technology," the judges said in their unanimous opinion. "This would not be the case in an election held in March 2004, when all the obsolete machines will have been totally withdrawn from use."

The decision overturns a federal district court decision and comes after other courts, including the California Supreme Court, ruled that the recall could go forward.

Either Secretary of State Kevin Shelley, who is responsible for California's elections and the defendant in the suit, or Ted Costa, the activist who led the recall drive, can appeal. Mr. Shelley said he had not made a decision, but Mr. Costa said he will file an appeal himself.

For now, though, the major candidates said they would continue to campaign as if the election were still Oct. 7.

"One million, six hundred thousand Californians of all political persuasions have signed petitions to recall Governor Gray Davis," said Arnold Schwarzenegger, the leading Republican candidate. "The secretary of state has certified that this election should go forth on Oct. 7. The California Supreme Court has also ruled that the election should go forward on Oct. 7. I fully expect that the federal courts will come to the same conclusion."

The delay played into Mr. Davis' argument that the entire recall was giving California a bad name.

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. KUHNER: Impeach the president?
  2. EDITORIAL: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow
  3. Obama backs plan to legalize illegals
  4. RUSE: The Girl Scout Sex Guide
  5. Gitmo suspects allowed laptops while in custody
More Top Stories »
  1. TURNER: Our lawbreaking Congress
  2. PRUDEN: Into the twilight zone
  3. STEYN: 'Deemocracy' in action
  4. EDITORIAL: WWII: The most racist generation
  5. Voight, tea party groups plan last-minute protest

Most Commented

  1. KUHNER: Impeach the president?
  2. Obama backs plan to legalize illegals
  3. EDITORIAL: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow
  4. Gitmo suspects allowed laptops while in custody
  5. Voight, tea party groups plan last-minute protest
More Top Stories »
  1. Health-vote ally Nelson to get new VA hospital for Nebraska
  2. Democrats make final push on health care
  3. EDITORIAL: WWII: The most racist generation
  4. Poll finds stubborn suspicion of census
  5. Key Democrat Boccieri switches to 'yes' on health vote

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Rep. Kevin Brady: This weekend has consequences

  • Belief Blog

    Nancy Pelosi invokes the 'wrong' St. Joseph

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.