


NEW YORK — The United States has narrowed differences with France by pledging to help draft an Iraqi constitution in six months and a government in one year, but many U.N. Security Council members say they will wait to see a proposed new draft resolution before they commit troops or aid.
The Bush administration is expected to circulate quietly a new resolution on Iraq by early next week to entice more nations to contribute to Iraq’s reconstruction.
The State Department and the White House have begun conferring on changes to the draft after a tightly scheduled series of meetings last week on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly debate.
“We’ve taken on board suggestions from the French and the Russians and others,” a U.S. official said.
Among the suggestions and demands: a larger and more concrete political role for the United Nations; a prime place for the organization in the transition to a permanent Iraqi government; and reducing Washington’s control over lucrative contracts to rebuild Iraq’s battered infrastructure and oil industry.
The administration would like to have a resolution in place before a conference of international donors for Iraq, scheduled for Oct. 23 in Madrid.
France’s U.N. ambassador, Jean-Marc de la Sabliere, said yesterday that Secretary of State Colin L. Powell’s pledge to try to get an Iraqi constitution within six months was “interesting.”
“But it doesn’t answer all the problems we would like to see solved,” he said.
Paris, the harshest critic of Washington in the council, has said it would abstain from voting rather than cast a veto. However, Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin said Sunday that France’s consent will require “a change of reality on the ground.”
Pakistan, also on the Security Council but without veto power, has all but ruled out sending troops to Iraq as part of a U.S.-led multinational force.
Munir Akram, Pakistan’s U.N. ambassador, said Islamabad would send troops only “as the desire of the Iraqi people, not as part of an occupation.”
The Turkish Parliament is evaluating whether to send troops, and a decision could be reached by early next month, a government spokesman said in Ankara yesterday.
South Korea, which has sent 700 engineering and medical troops to Iraq, yesterday signaled a willingness to send combat troops even as it faced street protests against the plan.
U.S. officials have declined to comment on the changes from the first proposal to the council, which was circulated late last month. Officials cautioned that the language is likely to concentrate on goals and intentions, rather than offer deadlines for Iraq’s return to self-rule.
View Entire StoryBy Mario Diaz
Left-coast judges rule Proposition 8 marriage backers driven by hostility

By Ralph Z. Hallow - The Washington Times
Bound by a common desire to deny President Obama a second term, restive activists gathering ...

By Dave Boyer - The Washington Times
Growing instability from Syria to Egypt highlights the Obama administration’s failure to develop a consistent ...

By Ben Wolfgang and Tim Devaney - The Washington Times
President Obama keeps tossing ideas to curb rising college tuition costs against the wall in ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

How does our 50th state view D.C. politics?

Great discoveries in the world of restaurants and chefs fulfill the quest for delicious food and cooking.

Despite cynicism about the law, it can provide you justice, protection, and ensure your rights. It can be exasperating, and at times, wildly entertaining.