- Obama downplays IRS scandal, blames Obamacare rollout on ‘outdated’ agencies
- Pregnancies decline overall, up among older women
- Pentagon plans to destroy Syrian chemical arms on ship at sea
- Paris Metro issues ‘politeness manual’ to improve passengers’ behavior
- Justin Bieber, crew detained at Australian airport in drug search
- Lee Rigby trial: Muslim who machete-hacked soldier calls it ‘humane’ kill
- GM ending Chevy sales in Europe to focus on Opel and Vauxhall
- Putin’s diplomats to U.S. busted for living high life off $1.5M bilked from Medicaid
- Happy Meal: Couple goes to McDonald’s, leaves with bag packed with cash
- Boehner: It took me 3 to 4 hours to sign up for Obamacare
Companies protest any do-not-spam list
Companies that use e-mail as a marketing tool are urging the Federal Trade Commission to decide against compiling a national “Do Not E-mail” registry as a way to cut down on spam.
Nearly all the comments collected by the Federal Trade Commission regarding the registry have come from groups who say the list would burden legitimate marketers while doing little to stop the most pervasive kinds of unwanted e-mail.
Fifteen of the 17 public comments made available to reporters by the FTC argue against the registry. They include submissions from the Direct Marketing Association, Visa Inc., several e-mail publishers and a host of local real estate associations.
The proposed national “Do Not E-mail” registry is modeled after the new national “Do Not Call” list designed to protect consumers from marketer phone calls. It was proposed as part of the federal Can-Spam Act, which went into effect Jan. 1.
The FTC has until June to tell Congress whether the registry is feasible. The public has until April 20 to submit comments.
FTC Chairman Timothy Muris has said several times that he does not believe an effective list can be created. His major objection, echoed by most other registry opponents, is that it would restrict the activities of honest companies but would be ignored by the worst spammers, who hide their identities and are responsible for as much as 90 percent of unwanted e-mail.
Spam makes up more than half of e-mail sent worldwide, and is most often fraudulent, pornographic or both. Analysts estimate that businesses lose more than $10 billion each year in productivity and services related to the problem.
“Put simply, a [Do Not E-mail] Registry would do nothing to reduce the amount of spam in consumers’ inboxes,” wrote Trevor Hughes, executive director of the E-mail Service Providers Coalition, a group of 48 companies involved in e-mail marketing. The group said the registry “would impede the growth of e-commerce, confuse consumers, and provide a rich source of valid e-mail addresses for spammers and hackers to target.”
Comments favoring the registry came from Aristotle.Net Inc., a small Internet provider in Little Rock, Ark., and Vincent S. Comperatore, a certified public accountant in Clifton, N.J., who commented simply: “Best idea since the ‘Do Not Call List.’ I strongly support this.”
Many registry supporters said they did not submit comments to the FTC because they already had issued opinions regarding the Can-Spam Act in general.
The Direct Marketing Association, which represents 4,000 companies worldwide, said a registry would cost the U.S. economy $12.5 billion per year and that DMA members would see a dramatic decline in the $33 billion spent by consumers as a result of e-mail advertising.
“The real fear of this is that our members will follow it, but it won’t stop spam,” Jerry Cerasale, the DMA’s senior vice president for government affairs, said in an interview. “It would make a worse impression for marketers using the e-mail system.”
About 10 companies responded to the FTC’s request for information on how to create the registry. The FTC has labeled those submissions confidential, with the exception of Unspam, a Chicago company that did not request confidentiality.
Unspam’s chief executive officer, Matthew Prince, said a registry would do little to stop e-mail from dishonest marketers.
But he said a registry would help build cases against spammers once they are caught, because prosecutors simply would have to prove that they sent messages to an e-mail addresses listed on the registry. Current laws usually require prosecutors to prove the e-mail messages were fraudulent or that the recipient explicitly asked not to receive them.
Why such hatred toward America's freedom of religion?
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality: liberal group
- Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.
- Russian diplomats busted bilking $1.5 million from Medicaid
- Democratic infighting erupts over 'we can have it all' fantasy on entitlements
- NAPOLITANO: Pope Francis should be saving souls, not pocketbooks
- Hack attack: 2 million Facebook, Twitter passwords stolen
- Obama returns to class warfare as poll numbers plunge
- CARSON: Getting to the top by starting at the bottom
- Activists encourage Obama to circumvent Congress, use more executive authority
- Obama lived with Uncle Onyango Obama in the 1980s, White House admits
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.
Understanding economic events with a free market explanation
John Wood illustrates a new American politics, and the path to get there.
Interviews and show reviews from the Los Angeles punk scene past and present. Los Angeles has always been rich in punk rock talent since punk rock was born.
White House pets gone wild!