- George W. Bush to embattled Alabama kicker: You will be stronger
- Megachurch pastor with ties to Obama commits suicide
- WaPo to readers: Send us your ‘gun violence’ stories for Sandy Hook anniversary
- U.S. threatens Ukraine with sanctions over dispatch of riot police
- Canada doing away with door-to-door mail delivery by 2018
- NSA chief defends phone spying: ‘There is no other way’
- Hawaii Health Department head killed in plane crash
- Colorado school drops sexual harassment label on boy who kissed girl’s hand
- Australia court strikes down 5-day-old, gay-marriage law
- Fake interpreter at Mandela service: ‘Sorry,’ I have schizophrenia
Question of the Day
RESTORING THE LOST CONSTITUTION: THE PRESUMPTION OF LIBERTY
Randy E. Barnett
Princeton University Press, $32.50, 381 pages
In 1787, the Founding Fathers forged a bulwark of freedom, the U.S. Constitution, with its Bill of Rights ratified in 1791. In 1878, British Prime Minister W. E. Gladstone called it “the most wonderful work ever struck off at a given time by the brain and purpose of man,” in an apparent try to distinguish it from the God-given Ten Commandments.
But Randy Barnett, the libertarian Austin B. Fletcher professor of law at Boston University, author of the “The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law” and an originalist in interpreting the Constitution, charges that you and the Constitution have suffered over its 217 years of existence from various amendments such as the 16th (income tax) Amendment and the 17th (Direct Election of Senators) Amendment, both of which were ratified in 1913.
Too, in Mr. Barnett’s remarkable historical overview, loose Supreme Court “living document” interpretations have eroded otherwise invaluable government safeguards, including the Ninth and 10th Amendments, theCommerce Clause, the Necessary and Proper Clause, the Privileges or Immunities Clause (of the 14th Amendment), the Second Amendment via “gun control,” and the Takings Clause in the Fifth Amendment via unwise readings of “eminent domain.”
Upshot per our author: The Constitution, based on the Founders’ presumption of liberty and natural rights (recall Thomas Jefferson citing “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God” in the Declaration of Independence), has been lost. A sorry situation, yet not an irretrievable one.
“Restoring the Lost Constitution” then is a hopeful work — provocative, documented, resolute, reasoned, readable — delightfully devoid of legalistic obtuseness. It lights up a road back to limited government, albeit a steep road.
Well, what’s wrong with the 16th Amendment? In authorizing an unrestricted tax on income, “from whatever source derived,” it strains the Fourth Amendment checks “againstunreasonable searches and seizures,” hits private property and privacy rights, opens up class warfare via rate progressivity between “the rich and the poor.” As Mr. Barnett says, “Many advocates of liberty think taxation of this sort is [legalized] theft.”
What about the 17th Amendment? Our author holds that popular election of senators “imprudently” nips a vital check on federal power: the offsetting power of senatorial appointments by state legislatures.
Also, the 14th Amendment requires that the privileges or immunities of citizens shall not be abridged. So it sets tight textual limits on the exercise of the states’ police power — limits not always observed by a pliable Supreme Court.
On the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause, our author sides with University of Chicago law professor Richard Epstein. Mr. Epstein notes that originally the clause prescribed takings of public property for public use only, but it has since been interpreted to permit takings for a public purpose, so gutting “a crucial limitation on this dangerous power.”
Thus a town may seize private property under eminent domain to erect, say, a new shopping mall and so gain greater local revenues. A no-no in the eyes of our author and the Founders.
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- Washington Post to readers: Send us your gun violence stories for Sandy Hook anniversary
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- MALCOLM/REIMER: Over-criminalization undermines respect for legal system
- Study IDs reasons for late-term abortions
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- Rand Paul: Budget deal 'shameful,' 'huge mistake'
- Colorado school drops sexual harassment label on boy who kissed girl's hand
- Teen thugs in D.C. run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Al Maurer provides a common sense, conservatarian, Constitutional conservative perspective from the battleground state of Colorado
Interviews and show reviews from the Los Angeles punk scene past and present. Los Angeles has always been rich in punk rock talent since punk rock was born.
Buzz on Bees is a column promoting the love and life of God’s greatest pollinators on earth: The Honeybee
Brazen, leading-edge, “call it like it is” columns and reporting from Ohio native, radio host and writer, Sara Marie Brenner.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow