The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Security

    Holder: Bin Laden won't be captured alive

  • Culture

    Arizona activists cited for leaving water for illegals

  • Golf

    Woods to return to golf at the Masters

  • Politics

    Pence mum on health-bill court challenge

  • World

    Guilty plea may not hurt BAE's U.S. arm

  • National

    Dodd introduces financial reform legislation

  • Politics

    Obama hones final health care pitch

Thursday, April 29, 2004

Britain seeks legal resolution for deployment after June 30

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Stories

  • Holder: Bin Laden won't be captured alive
  • Fed holds rates at record lows
  • Clinton: Israel must show peace committal
  • Pakistani bank's ex-chief fights extradition

By

LONDON -- Britain warned yesterday that it will need a firm legal framework based on a U.N. resolution or a deal with the new Iraq government in order to keep its troops operating in the country after a June 30 transfer of sovereignty.

At the same time, army chiefs reportedly have been urging Prime Minister Tony Blair to put off announcing that Britain will replace the withdrawing Spanish forces with about 1,700 fresh British troops in and around the Shi'ite flash point of Najaf.

"The senior British military are strongly opposed to taking over the Spanish areas of command or sending further troops," an unnamed senior British source told the Guardian newspaper.

The newspaper said they are seeking assurances that by the time new forces arrive -- mainly infantry but also elements of an air-assault unit -- their position will not have been made precarious by precipitate U.S. military actions.

Asked at a press conference about the prospects for future British forces operating in Iraq, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw supplied a carefully phrased answer.

"I can give an absolute assurance that British forces will operate strictly within the law," he said, adding that the legal basis of their presence "depends on the nature of the caretaker government and the wording of the new U.N. resolution."

Prime Minister Tony Blair sought earlier this week to quash speculation about a new deployment to Iraq, saying at a press conference with Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi: "The advice that we have is that we have sufficient troops to do the job."

But, he acknowledged, "We keep the question of troops under review at all times."

British military lawyers and generals privately have been advising the government to postpone any increase in troop strength until a new Iraqi government takes power and the legal basis for their presence is clarified.

Otherwise, the lawyers fear, their troops could be accused of war crimes.

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. WOLF: Questions for your representative
  2. Social Security IOUs stashed away
  3. PRUDEN: The suicide mission for the Democrats
  4. EDITORIAL: Obama nominee's sympathy for sexual sadists
  5. WOLF: Obama family health care fracas
More Top Stories »
  1. E-mails suggested Fort Hood suspect subpar for Army
  2. Justice, CIA clash over probe of interrogator IDs
  3. BLANKLEY: Our sturdy system of governance
  4. KUHNER: A gangster regime
  5. Temporary foreign workers threaten immigration deal

Most Commented

  1. GOP to use amendments as tactic
  2. Obama hones final health care pitch
  3. E-mails suggested Fort Hood suspect subpar for Army
  4. Justice, CIA clash over probe of interrogator IDs
  5. Temporary foreign workers threaten immigration deal
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Obama's sick obsession
  2. GOP move on pork pressures Obama
  3. Obama humanizes health debate in final push
  4. Dodd introduces financial reform legislation
  5. GOP blasts Democrats over health bill tactic

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Pelosi: 'Will do what is necessary' to pass health care bill

  • Belief Blog

    Sayonara to the president's faith-based council

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.