The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Technology

    Study: D.C. area 3rd riskiest for cybercrime

  • Politics

    Landmark health care plan passes

  • Politics

    CURL: Bipartisan only in opposition

  • Security

    Navy warns ships about al Qaeda risk near Yemen

  • Politics

    Immigration advocates pressure Obama

  • Investigation

    Postal exec taps former associate for no-bid pact

  • National

    WILLIAMS: Genuine economic stimulus

Wednesday, August 4, 2004

Missouri marriage amendment wins handily

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Stories

  • Clinton: U.S. wants sanctions on Iran
  • California cops on alert for booby traps
  • Netanyahu nixes East Jerusalem building curbs
  • Senate rivals in Missouri vie for 'outsider' role

By

A state constitutional amendment to define marriage in Missouri as the union of a man and woman cruised to a lopsided victory last night.

With 51 percent of precincts reporting last night, the amendment had received 659,267 "yes" votes to 251,754 "no" votes -- a margin of 72 percent to 28 percent.

"We're very gratified, encouraged and thankful" for the vote, said Vicky Hartzler of the Coalition to Protect Marriage in Missouri. "Here in the heartland, we've sent a message to the rest of the nation that we value marriage, and we want it to be protected from legal challenges. It's 'we, the people,' not 'we, the courts.'"

The Family Research Council also hailed last night's "win for traditional marriage in Missouri," the nation's first popular vote on homosexual "marriage" since the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court legalized the unions in that state in November.

"Citizens from all across the Show Me State have shown once again that when the people's voice is not muted by unelected judges, they speak out soundly in support of marriage as it has always been traditionally defined," said Tony Perkins, council president.

Pro-family groups scored two other victories yesterday, with activists in North Dakota and Ohio saying that they had collected enough signatures to put state constitutional amendments against homosexual "marriage" on their ballots.

The amendment had been leading in newspaper public-opinion polls, with from 56 percent to 62 percent support. But opponents of homosexual "marriage" were helped to an even bigger triumph by a heavy turnout, which was projected at more than 40 percent of registered voters -- compared with 25 percent in the 2002 state primary.

Turnout was also boosted by a hotly contested Democratic gubernatorial battle between incumbent Gov. Bob Holden and state Auditor Claire McCaskill.

Opponents of the amendment, arguing that Missouri law already prohibits same-sex "marriage" in the state and disallows recognition of same-sex "marriages" from other states, recently had blitzed the state with ads asking voters not to support such a "mean-spirited" amendment.

"We're already reaching out to these other states, sharing with them what we learned, what worked, what didn't work, and we'll move on," said Doug Gray, campaign manager for the Constitution Defense League.

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. KUHNER: Impeach the president?
  2. EDITORIAL: Democrats' death by suicide
  3. RUSE: The Girl Scout Sex Guide
  4. HANSON: Proud to help -- and to fly our flag
  5. EDITORIAL: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow
More Top Stories »
  1. BERMAN: Charities behaving badly
  2. Maryland not dying to be Dixie
  3. Lawmaker won't press charges in spitting incident
  4. EDITORIAL: Hiding the true cost of Obamacare
  5. ROOT: Outdated union red tape strangles recovery

Most Commented

  1. KUHNER: Impeach the president?
  2. Lawmaker won't press charges in spitting incident
  3. Obama backs plan to legalize illegals
  4. Voight, tea party groups plan last-minute protest
  5. Obama urges Dems to come together for health care
More Top Stories »
  1. Landmark health care plan passes
  2. EDITORIAL: Democrats' death by suicide
  3. Key Democrat Boccieri switches to 'yes' on health vote
  4. Raucous buildup precedes health care vote
  5. CURL: Obama the Innocent stumps for health care

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Stupak sells out pro-life movement

  • Belief Blog

    Nancy Pelosi invokes the 'wrong' St. Joseph

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.