- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
Maryland spam law ruled illegal
A Montgomery County judge has ruled that Maryland’s anti-spam law — the nation’s first to penalize senders of junk e-mail — is unconstitutional because it attempts to regulate commerce outside the state’s borders.
Circuit Court Judge Durke G. Thompson issued the written opinion last Thursday. The ruling throws out a lawsuit against New York e-mail marketer Joseph Frevola and essentially overturns Maryland’s 2002 Commercial Electronic Mail Act.
Eric Menhart, a George Washington University law student who brought the case against Mr. Frevola, has vowed to appeal.
The Baltimore Sun reported Judge Thompson’s decision yesterday.
Business and individuals struggle to manage spam, the common term for junk e-mail advertising. The messages — considered a nuisance by most computer users — often promote low-cost mortgages, designer watches and products designed to cure male impotency.
Congress and more than 35 states have passed laws to combat spam. Courts in California and Washington have declared their state laws unconstitutional on grounds similar to Judge Thompson’s decision, but appeals courts in those states have upheld the laws.
The Maryland law allows residents who receive e-mail that contains false claims to sue for damages. Under a separate criminal statute enacted in October, spammers face as many as $25,000 in penalties and 10 years in prison.
The law should stand, Assistant Attorney General Steve Sakamoto-Wengel told the Associated Press.
“The law over the Internet is developing. There are going to be conflicting rulings,” he said. But the ultimate hope is that “they all get resolved and we have clear rules over what states can and can’t regulate.”
Judge Thompson’s decision is unlikely to affect what happens in other states, said Douglas M. Isenberg, an Atlanta lawyer who specializes in technology, the Internet and intellectual property.
Also, the decision does not necessarily represent a major victory for spammers, he said.
“The fact that a single state law has been struck down does not necessarily mean the floodgates are going to open for spammers,” Mr. Isenberg said.
The federal anti-spam law that took effect in January does not allow individuals to sue spammers. It supersedes most state laws unless — like Maryland — the state addresses deceptive or fraudulent e-mail in specific terms.
The Maryland law applies to e-mail sent to or from Maryland residents, but it leaves vague the actual location of the resident — potentially affecting companies that send e-mail to people who live in Maryland, but who might receive the transmission elsewhere via laptop.
Mr. Menhart, 25, lives in the District, but he set up a corporation in Maryland called MaryCLE to fight spam and pay Maryland taxes. His domain name is “maryland-state-resident.com.”
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Memories of a long brotherhood tempered in common struggle
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- House votes for bargain to end budget drama
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- ICT trade mission to Azerbaijan successfully completed
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- CHELLANEY: China's game of chicken
- Inside China: Ukraine gets nuke umbrella
- EDITORIAL: The Potemkin website
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Consummate traveler Todd DeFeo explores the unique stories that make destinations worth going to.
Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow