- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
Majority against same-sex ‘marriage’
A majority of Americans say they do not want laws in their states that would legalize same-sex “marriages,” according to a poll taken after the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling in favor of such “marriages.”
The Massachusetts high court, in an advisory opinion, said Wednesday that homosexuals are entitled to nothing less than “marriage” and that civil unions will not suffice.
In a poll conducted by the National Annenberg Election Survey, people said by a 2 to 1 margin — 60 percent to 31 percent — that they oppose any similar law legalizing same-sex “marriage” in their states.
Forty-nine percent of those polled were opposed to the idea of a federal constitutional amendment to ban same-sex “marriages,” while 42 percent favored it.
The White House is still reviewing the issue. “If activist judges continue to try to redefine marriage, without regard to the voice of the people, then the only alternative will be a constitutional process,” said Press Secretary Scott McClellan.
Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, the front-runner for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination, said last week: “I believe and have fought for the principle that we should protect the fundamental rights of gay and lesbian couples — from inheritance to health benefits. I believe the right answer is civil unions. I oppose gay ‘marriage’ and disagree with the Massachusetts court’s decision.”
The Annenberg poll of 814 adults was conducted Feb. 5-8 and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
Moreover, an Associated Press survey of Massachusetts lawmakers shows a legislature deeply divided over a proposed constitutional amendment to ban homosexual “marriage” in the state where the nation’s first legally sanctioned same-sex “weddings” could take place as early as May.
All of Massachusetts’ legislators were contacted by telephone and e-mail by the AP since last week’s Supreme Judicial Court opinion. Of the 147 who responded, 62 said they would oppose the constitutional amendment, while 70 said they could support it. An additional 12 said they were undecided, and three had no comment. Fifty-two did not respond.
There is probably nothing lawmakers can do to prevent the nation’s first homosexual “marriages” from taking place May 17. The earliest the proposed amendment could reach the ballot is November 2006.
That is because the proposal first needs to be approved by a majority of lawmakers in two successive legislative sessions, which in Massachusetts last for two years. That means a revamped legislature could take up the issue after next fall’s elections.
Both Republican Gov. Mitt Romney and Democratic House Speaker Thomas Finneran have expressed their adamant support for the amendment. Most of the Republicans who responded were in favor of the amendment, but they occupy only 29 of the 200 legislative seats in the legislature.
Last night, Senate leaders discussed a possible compromise amendment that would ban homosexual “marriage” but allow civil unions — though it is not clear if that would satisfy either side or the court.
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- House pushes through two-year Ryan-Murray budget deal
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.
An informed and often humorous take on the world of advertising, public relations and social media. 100% Pure. Not from concentrate.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow