


Bias is catching: Voters from both political parties now think that the news media takes a partisan tilt in its election coverage, according to a Pew Research Center survey released Sunday.
“Perceptions of partisan bias seen as growing — especially by Democrats,” the survey stated.
Among those Democrats, 29 percent think the coverage favors Republicans, up from 19 percent in 2000. And among Republicans, 42 percent think the coverage is biased toward Democrats, up from 37 percent in 2000.
Such concern is growing among all voters. Back in 1987, 62 percent of viewers thought that election coverage was free of favoritism. Now, only 38 percent would agree.
Most also think the news coverage itself is pushing an agenda.
Overall, 65 percent of Americans think the news is biased a “great deal” or a “fair amount.” Among conservative Republicans, the figure was 72 percent. Among liberal Democrats, the figure was 66 percent.
Such feelings were more pronounced in specific audiences, however.
Among those who watch the Fox News Channel, 76 percent think that the news is biased a great deal or fair amount. The figure stood at 72 percent among those who listen to talk radio, 73 percent who monitor news on the Internet, 69 percent who watch CNN and 66 percent who rely on newspapers for their updates.
Still, the public continues to pine for untainted news. The survey also found that two-thirds of Americans (67 percent) say they prefer news with “no particular political point of view,” while a quarter want news that reflects their own politics. That figure has remained virtually unchanged since 2000.
The survey also plumbed the mysteries of the true campaign junkie — those devotees who follow the political horse race with relish. The “campaign news enthusiast,” as Pew diplomatically notes, represents only 7 percent of the population.
But they are a smitten bunch.
The survey found that among this group, 53 percent regularly watch political debates, compared with 20 percent of the general population. Another 80 percent of the “enthusiasts” watch those endless campaign interviews and speeches, and almost half go online regularly to check up on various races.
The Pew survey found that endorsements from celebrities or special-interest groups have little influence.
Among the respondents, 84 percent said it made “no difference” if NBC “Tonight Show” host Jay Leno endorsed a candidate. Another 67 percent said Al Gore’s endorsement would not sway their vote.
View Entire StoryBy Mario Diaz
Left-coast judges rule Proposition 8 marriage backers driven by hostility

By Ralph Z. Hallow - The Washington Times
Bound by a common desire to deny President Obama a second term, restive activists gathering ...

By Dave Boyer - The Washington Times
Growing instability from Syria to Egypt highlights the Obama administration’s failure to develop a consistent ...

By Ben Wolfgang and Tim Devaney - The Washington Times
President Obama keeps tossing ideas to curb rising college tuition costs against the wall in ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

How does our 50th state view D.C. politics?

Great discoveries in the world of restaurants and chefs fulfill the quest for delicious food and cooking.

Despite cynicism about the law, it can provide you justice, protection, and ensure your rights. It can be exasperating, and at times, wildly entertaining.