Medicare drug plan balloons

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen

By

President Bush's budget next week will show the new prescription drug program costs $540 billion over 10 years, more than one-third higher than the $400 billion estimate Congress used in passing the bill in November.

"That really is a shocker," said Robert L. Bixby, executive director of the budget watchdog Concord Coalition. "It's a huge change. If a number like this had been floating around the Capitol last fall, it never would have passed."

Congressional Republicans, meeting for a legislative retreat in Philadelphia yesterday, were briefed on budget numbers by administration officials. On Monday, Mr. Bush will send his fiscal 2005 budget to Congress, having pledged to limit nondefense discretionary spending increases to 1 percent.

Part of that increase will be in the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), which first lady Laura Bush announced yesterday will get an $18 million boost, a 15 percent increase over the $122.5 million approved for fiscal year 2004.

But the Medicare number promises to be a bigger problem as the budget debate unfolds. Some Republicans in the House only voted for the bill after being promised the costs wouldn't exceed $400 billion -- something dozens of taxpayer-advocacy and policy-analysis groups said was inevitable.

"We told you so," said Robert E. Moffit of the Heritage Foundation, who said he expects the estimate to go higher with every new projection. "None of this bad news goes away. It gets worse."

The administration's higher estimate of costs comes from its Office of Management and Budget (OMB) from Medicare's actuaries. The lower estimate used by Congress last year came from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

Trent Duffy, a spokesman for the White House, said it is "the norm, not the exception" to have differences between OMB figures and CBO figures.

"This is ground-breaking legislation in a very unpredictable field, which is health care," Mr. Duffy said. "There are a lot of moving parts and variables, and the experts do their best, but the one thing we know about projections is they are typically wrong."