Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Letters to the Editor

Day After’ gets it wrong, and right

In watching the movie “The Day After Tomorrow,” I found it had nothing to teach us about the science of global warming. In fact, the film offers viewers a “kindergarten science” knowledge of the subject. There is no enlightenment on the underlying causes and determinants of global warming and even less on what can and might be done to counteract the threats.

The movie rests on a fictitious theory that melting ice caps in Antarctica or Greenland could disrupt ocean currents, generating a sharp drop in temperatures. The theory behind this Hollywood fantasy actually would benefit us, in light of the temperature change caused by rising concentrations of greenhouse gases and of atmospheric carbon dioxide, leading to the enrichment of global food production.

These Hollywood “experts” seem to suggest that a sudden switch from gradual climate change to instant hemisphere freeze is all but inevitable. The only positive outcome from this mythical film would be the hope for a rise in the economy, as past scares have created: Remember the year-2000-bug threat? It’s impressive how Hollywood continually corrupts our intelligence.

MICHAEL E. WOOD

Chicago

The $125 million disaster flick “The Day After Tomorrow” takes some science to an extreme for artistic effect.

One segment rings true, though: Mexican officials turn away U.S. refugees attempting to cross the border. Anyone who has dealt with Mexican officials knows that taking advantage of American tourists is standard operating procedure. There are examples of Americans having to pay hospitals and doctors before receiving medical attention. There are similar examples of injustice done by Mexican officials to Americans who own land in Mexico, as well as those Americans unfortunate enough to fall into legal troubles in Mexico.

And of course, the double-dealing from our parasitic “good neighbor,” who sends us millions of her socially and economically deprived citizens and then rages that we don’t treat them well enough. With neighbors like that, who needs a disaster flick?

BARBARA VICKROY

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • ** FILE ** Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich speaks during a news conference on Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

    Questions surface on Gingrich campaign travel payments

    By Luke Rosiak - The Washington Times

  • U.S. Capitol Police officers keep watch after a 29-year-old Moroccan man was arrested Friday in an FBI sting operation near the Capitol while planning to detonate what police said he thought were live explosives, in Washington, Friday, Feb. 17, 2012. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

    Terror suspect arrested near U.S. Capitol

    By Tom Howell Jr. - The Washington Times

  • Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Associated Press)

    Justice says Supreme Court should revisit campaign finance

    By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          The Political Pro-Con

          Not your typical discussion, writer Conor Murphy writes about the cons, and pros, of politics

          A Heart Without Compromise; Advocating for Children

          Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.