The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Technology

    Study: D.C. area 3rd riskiest for cybercrime

  • Politics

    Landmark health care plan passes

  • Politics

    CURL: Bipartisan only in opposition

  • Security

    Navy warns ships about al Qaeda risk near Yemen

  • Politics

    Immigration advocates pressure Obama

  • Investigation

    Postal exec taps former associate for no-bid pact

  • National

    WILLIAMS: Genuine economic stimulus

Wednesday, June 30, 2004

Court rejects Internet porn law

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Stories

  • Clinton: U.S. wants sanctions on Iran
  • California cops on alert for booby traps
  • Netanyahu nixes East Jerusalem building curbs
  • Senate rivals in Missouri vie for 'outsider' role

By

The Supreme Court yesterday barred the Justice Department's enforcement of a law aimed at keeping Internet pornography from children, saying it was likely unconstitutional when remanding it to a federal court for a new trial to resolve the issue.

The high court, in a 5-4 decision, upheld an injunction against enforcing the Child Online Protection Act and sent it back to the U.S. District Court in Philadelphia for a trial to consider changes in technology and the law since its 1998 adoption.

"Content-based prohibitions, enforced by severe criminal penalties, have the constant potential to be a repressive force in the lives and thoughts of a free people," Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote, adding that COPA "presumes that parents lack the ability, not the will, to monitor what their children see.

"By enacting programs to promote use of filtering software, Congress could give parents that ability without subjecting protected speech to severe penalties," he said.

Justice Kennedy was joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter and Clarence Thomas, who agreed that holding a new trial in the matter would allow further discussions on what technology, if any, might allow adults to see and buy material legal for them while keeping it out of the hands of children.

Writing for the minority, Justice Stephen G. Breyer said COPA "imposes a burden on protected speech that is no more than modest," it did not act as a censor for all materials and it should be upheld as constitutional.

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist joined the dissent, and Justice Antonin Scalia wrote his own dissent.

Justice Breyer said the law "requires providers of the 'harmful to minors' material to restrict minors' access to it by verifying age. They can do so by inserting screens that verify age using a credit card, adult personal identification number or other similar technology.

"In this way, the act requires creation of an Internet screen that minors, but not adults, will find difficult to bypass," he wrote.

The ruling in an appeal by the Justice Department and Attorney General John Ashcroft prevents prosecutors from filing criminal cases under COPA, which restricts and sets civil and criminal penalties for displaying sexually explicit material deemed "harmful to minors" on commercial Web sites.

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. KUHNER: Impeach the president?
  2. EDITORIAL: Democrats' death by suicide
  3. RUSE: The Girl Scout Sex Guide
  4. HANSON: Proud to help -- and to fly our flag
  5. EDITORIAL: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow
More Top Stories »
  1. BERMAN: Charities behaving badly
  2. Maryland not dying to be Dixie
  3. EDITORIAL: Hiding the true cost of Obamacare
  4. STEYN: 'Deemocracy' in action
  5. Landmark health care plan passes

Most Commented

  1. KUHNER: Impeach the president?
  2. Lawmaker won't press charges in spitting incident
  3. Obama backs plan to legalize illegals
  4. Voight, tea party groups plan last-minute protest
  5. Obama urges Dems to come together for health care
More Top Stories »
  1. Landmark health care plan passes
  2. EDITORIAL: Democrats' death by suicide
  3. Key Democrat Boccieri switches to 'yes' on health vote
  4. Raucous buildup precedes health care vote
  5. CURL: Obama the Innocent stumps for health care

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Stupak sells out pro-life movement

  • Belief Blog

    Nancy Pelosi invokes the 'wrong' St. Joseph

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.