- National laboratory cancels ‘Southern Accent Reduction’ classes after outcry
- U.S. woman with Ebola is stable, improving, son says
- Belgium pushes for clear labeling of goods from Israeli settlements
- ‘Queen of Mean’ Leona Helmsley’s former home hits market for $65M
- Florida beach-goers told to beware flesh-eating bacteria in water
- Lundergan Grimes uses ‘war on women’ strategy to attack McConnell
- Rep. Jeff Miller: ‘Ain’t no leash for VA’
- Al Qaeda nets $125M from ransom payoffs from Europe since 2008
- Ohio Gov. John Kasich cruising to re-election: survey
- Landslide hits Indian village; 150 may be trapped
Court calls off same-sex ‘weddings’
Question of the Day
California’s high court yesterday ended San Francisco’s monthlong wedding party when it ordered city officials to stop issuing “marriage” licenses to same-sex couples immediately.
San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom must “refrain from issuing marriage licenses or certificates not authorized” by California marriage laws, the California Supreme Court said in a unanimous ruling.
Almost 4,200 marriage licenses have been issued in San Francisco since Feb. 12.
The seven justices said their ruling did not address the legality of such homosexual “marriages,” and said they would hear the arguments in May or June on lawsuits brought by the state and by pro-family groups against San Francisco’s issuing the licenses.
Meanwhile, in Massachusetts, lawmakers preliminarily passed a state constitutional amendment that says marriage is the union of a man and a woman and creates a civil-union system for same-sex couples.
The amendment passed 129-69, far more than the 101 votes needed. It was supported by Senate President Robert Travaglini and House Speaker Thomas Finneran, both Democrats.
The amendment also won a second preliminary vote, but advocates of homosexual “marriage” were conducting procedural maneuvers to derail the proposal late last night.
Conservative groups oppose the current amendment because it creates civil unions. Homosexual rights groups oppose any amendment because the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court already has granted them full marriage rights as of May 17, and they do not want to settle for civil unions.
In Oregon yesterday, a state circuit court ordered officials from the state’s largest county to stop issuing “marriage” licenses to same-sex couples or explain their actions at a court date to be determined today.
Multnomah County officials said they would continue to issue licenses. The county, which includes Portland, has issued more than 1,700 licenses already.
President Bush yesterday reiterated his support for a federal marriage amendment.
“I will defend the sanctity of marriage against activist courts and local officials who want to redefine marriage. The union of a man and woman is the most enduring human institution,” Mr. Bush said via satellite at the National Association of Evangelicals’ convention in Colorado.
Sen. John Kerry, Massachusetts Democrat and presumed presidential nominee, supports civil unions but not same-sex “marriage.” He has denounced Mr. Bush’s stance as divisive and unnecessary.
In California, Attorney General Bill Lockyer, who filed a lawsuit two weeks ago with the high court, said yesterday he was “gratified” that the court “granted our request to quickly resolve this issue.”
- Patent workers paid to exercise, shop, do chores: report
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- CARSON: Rudderless U.S. foreign policy
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Fla. mom arrested for allowing 7-year-old son to walk to park alone
- Smugglers, rainstorm combine to poke holes in border fence
- Obama mum on where illegal immigrant children are sheltered
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- Defense lawyer: McDonnell's wife had 'crush' on CEO
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of politicizing business
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world