- Marco Rubio: U.S. at social, moral crossroads
- ‘We’re coming for you, Barack Obama’: Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL
- White flags baffle NYPD: ‘We’re lucky it wasn’t a bomb’
- N.Y. Gov. Cuomo’s office interfered with, pressured corruption commission: report
- Brit lawmaker: I would fire on Israel if I lived in Gaza
- VA apologizes to forgotten Marine veteran locked in Fla. clinic, forced to call 911
- U.S. social and economic trends on worrisome track, survey finds
- McDonald nomination unanimously referred to full Senate
- Chuck Norris honorary chairman of NRA voter registration campaign
- GOP outraged Obamacare investigators able to get coverage with fake IDs
How WWI was waged at sea deck
Question of the Day
Robert Massie’s credentials as a historian are impressive indeed. After studying history at Yale, he attended Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar and there studied modern European history. His second book, “Peter the Great,” won the Pulitzer Prize for biography in 1981.
Modern history, however, is Massie’s field, and his best book to date may be his 1991 work “Dreadnought,” which considers the four decades of political rivalry in Europe that led up to World War I. In “Dreadnought,” the reader is reminded that the author is a biographer at heart: His portraits of the young Winston Churchill; of the intense, eccentric Adm. Sir John “Jacky” Fisher; and of Germany’s ambitious Adm. Alfred von Tirpitz make for a riveting narrative.
With “Castles of Steel,” Mr. Massie moves on to the war at sea that resulted from the naval race, taking the British and German battle fleets from the diplomatic crisis of July 1914 through the scuttling of the German High Seas Fleet at Scapa Flow in 1919.
The two great fleets had vastly different origins. The German fleet was the creation of an unstable monarch, Kaiser Wilhelm II, who chose to compete for naval supremacy with the Royal Navy.
Starting almost from scratch in the 1890s, Germany developed a modern fleet that in many respects was superior to its British rival. Britain’s Royal Navy, in contrast, entered the 20th century encumbered with tradition and sloth.
Few of its officers had ever seen a shot fired in battle. Firing practice was discouraged because of its effect on paintwork, for cleanliness — the mark of a “smart ship” — was what counted in efficiency ratings.
The transition from sail to steam had been achieved with some difficulty. One elderly captain had entered port under both sail and steam, and ordered the sails struck and the anchor dropped. Moments before his ship ran aground the skipper was reminded that he had not stopped the engines. “Bless me,” he remarked, “I forgot we had engines.”
The man who brought the Royal Navy into the 20th century was the energetic Fisher. As First Sea Lord he introduced the all-big-gun Dreadnought, the turbine-powered vessel that made all earlier battleships obsolete.
The problem was that it made most of the Royal Navy obsolete as well, allowing the Kaiser to threaten Britain’s supremacy at sea despite his late start and inferior numbers.
The two navies brought different assets and liabilities to the conflict. Britain’s Grand Fleet consistently outnumbered German warships in the North Sea, and its battleships — Winston Churchill’s “castles of steel” — mounted heavier guns than their German counterparts.
On the other hand, German vessels had better watertight construction and were more heavily armored. The Kaiser’s navy reflected von Tirpitz’s conviction that “the supreme quality of a ship is that it should remain afloat.” And German gunnery was consistently better than that of their adversaries.
At sea as on land, World War I confounded the planners on both sides. The Germans anticipated a sea blockade, but thought that an enemy blockade close to their own coast would be vulnerable to sorties by their own warships.
Instead, Britain instituted a remote blockade, declaring most of the North Sea a war zone and enforcing the blockade from a distance. Much of the war was passed in attempts by each side to lure the other into a naval ambush.
Neither side anticipated the importance of submarines. The sinking of three British cruisers by a U-9 in September 1914 threw a scare into the Royal Navy that plagued it throughout the war.
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Democratic Sen. John Walsh plagiarized War College master's thesis: report
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Netanyahu's Wikipedia page replaced with giant Palestinian flag
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
- Hezbollah warring in Syria could join fight against Israel
- Despite rhetoric, gun prosecutions plummet under Obama
- DEACE: How to go from civil rights icon to bigot in one quote
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq