Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Gay ‘marriage’ foes seek injunction in federal court

Lawyers representing 11 Massachusetts lawmakers and a traditional-values group leader yesterday asked a federal judge in Boston to temporarily block the state from issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples on Monday.

U.S. District Judge Joseph Tauro said he would issue a ruling late today or tomorrow.

Matthew Staver, president and general counsel of the Florida-based Liberty Counsel, said the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court overstepped its jurisdiction in its Nov. 18 Goodridge et al. vs. Department of Public Health ruling, which legalized same-sex “marriages” in the state.

In that ruling, the high court said Massachusetts officials were violating same-sex couples’ constitutional rights by denying them marriage licenses. Under its “reformulation” of marriage, the court ordered the state to begin issuing marriage licenses to adult couples, regardless of gender, as of May 17.

Conservative lawyers yesterday argued that under the Massachusetts Constitution, the executive and legislative branches have jurisdiction over marriage law and that the high court usurped its powers.

The federal court can intervene in this case, the lawyers argued, because it has the authority under the U.S. Constitution’s “guarantee clause” to ensure that states respect this “separation of powers.”

Massachusetts Assistant Attorney General Peter Sacks, arguing on behalf of the Massachusetts high court, said the decision was based on an interpretation of the state constitution and was within the high court’s purview.

“These are pure questions of state law,” Mr. Sacks said. “There is no jurisdictional basis for this [federal] court to intervene or second-guess the [state court’s] ruling on a core matter of state law.”

Attorneys with Gay & Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, who won the Goodridge case, also defended the high court’s authority.

Lawyers said yesterday it was likely that no matter which side wins in District Court, the case will be appealed to the First Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston.

Mr. Staver and conservatives filed their case on Monday on behalf of Catholic Action League official Robert Largess. Late Tuesday, a Massachusetts state senator and 10 state representatives joined the case as plaintiffs.

Meanwhile, in Superior Court in Suffolk County, a judge dismissed a lawsuit against the Goodridge case brought by the Arizona-based conservative group Alliance Defense Fund on behalf of former Boston Mayor Raymond Flynn and businessman Thomas Shields.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney speaks at a campaign rally in Mesa, Ariz., on Monday. Arizona holds its GOP presidential primary on Feb. 28, the same day as Michigan, the home state of the former Massachusetts governor. (Associated Press)

    Romney finds tough times in Michigan

    By Andrea Billups - The Washington Times

  • TRAILING: Rick Santorum has won four states but just three delegates so far. Mitt Romney also has won four states but has 73 delegates. He is waging a strong effort to beat Mr. Santorum in Michigan. (Associated Press)

    Victory doesn’t always mean gain in delegates

    By Seth McLaughlin - The Washington Times

  • Education Department deploys ‘mystery shoppers’ to check for fraud

    By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Riffs

          Find up-to-date information on the D.C. and Baltimore live music scenes and read interviews with artists and reviews of the latest releases and concerts.

          Ad Lib

          Are there profound differences between the Left and the Right? You betcha.