ICC seen as 'forum' for hits on U.S., allies

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen

By

The French lawyer helping to represent Saddam Hussein plans to sue the British government for war crimes before the International Criminal Court (ICC), one of a growing number of appeals to the new world court to try U.S. and British soldiers and officials over the war in Iraq.

Legal analysts said yesterday there was almost no chance the ICC would agree to hear the case, but critics of the fledgling world court say the filing itself is a mark of the growing politicization of the court by opponents of the U.S.-led reconstruction mission in Iraq.

"Essentially, those who don't like the war or U.S. foreign policy goals have a great new forum to accuse the United States and its allies of torturing and killing people as a matter of policy," said Jack Spencer, a senior policy analyst with the Heritage Foundation's Davis Institute for International Studies.

Jacques Verges, who has represented such notorious clients as Nazi war criminal Klaus Barbie and international hit man Carlos the Jackal, told reporters in Paris last week that the filing was being made on behalf of "families of prisoners of the coalition in which Britain participates."

"The reality of torture and systematic abuses of the dignity of Iraqi prisoners, sometimes followed by murders, both by U.S. and British troops, is no longer in question," according to the filing with The Hague-based court.

A spokesman for British Prime Minister Tony Blair has refused comment on the filing, saying it was a pending legal matter. Officials at the ICC could not be reached for comment yesterday, but have also refused to talk in the past about filings made by individuals.

The United States, which has rejected the treaty establishing the court, is not named as a party in Mr. Verges' filing. Britain is a member-state of the ICC, as are Italy, Poland and other nations contributing to the military coalition in Iraq.

Iraq's new governing council has also not ratified the ICC treaty, which means the court has no direct jurisdiction over U.S. military and civilian personnel now in Iraq.

And because Iraq under Saddam also never ratified the ICC, the court never investigated widespread and heavily documented human rights complaints of horrific abuse, torture and murder by members of Saddam's regime against political dissidents and prisoners.

Despite its lack of direct jurisdiction, the ICC has been flooded with suits from around the globe on Iraq, even before the recent revelations of suspected prison abuse by U.S. and British forces in the country.