- Article
- Comments ()
- Videos
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- News organizations declared President Bush a winner in the most hotly contested state in the 2004 election, but Democrats refused to concede in an election marked by extraordinary legal wrangling.
With 87 percent of the state's precincts reporting, Mr. Bush had 2,485,860 votes (51 percent) to 2,357,347 (48 percent) for Democratic Sen. John Kerry.
Those numbers were enough for NBC and Fox News to declare a Bush victory in Ohio, but Kerry campaign officials issued a statement saying that they would win the state. A Kerry win would require that the remaining uncounted ballots in Ohio break to the Democrat by a margin of more than 2-to-1.
Polls in two Ohio counties remained open at least three hours past their scheduled closing times last night, after a judge ruled in favor of a lawsuit by state Democrats, the latest in a slew of legal challenges that have marked the state's hard-fought presidential race.
The Democrats' lawsuit to keep the polls open in Franklin and Knox counties reminded some Republicans of a similar suit filed in Missouri in 2000 that kept polls open an extra 45 minutes in St. Louis, a Democratic stronghold.
The Democrats sued, said Michael Deemer, legal counsel for the Ohio Senate Minority (Democratic) Caucus, because voters were found to be waiting in long lines in Franklin and Knox counties.
Democrats asked that an alternative method of voting, either with provisional ballots or with separate paper ballots, be allowed to accommodate the throngs of people. The judge ruled that paper ballots for the old punch-card system be used for those in line.
State law dictates than anyone standing in line before the polls close will get to vote. Carlo LoParo, spokesman for the Ohio secretary of state, said that office would not oppose the ruling. A source close to the state GOP, however, said Republican lawyers were contemplating a court fight.
Another late-afternoon lawsuit was filed in Blackwell and Hamilton counties, citing the landmark 2000 Bush v. Gore decision and arguing that those areas are not using a standard to count provisional ballots.
The plaintiff in the case is listed as Audrey Schoring. Her party affiliation was not clear last night.







Post a comment
There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.