Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

House GOP changes rule that could remove DeLay

House Democrats yesterday opted to keep their current leadership for the next Congress, while House Republicans voted to change their internal rules in an attempt to ensure that their team is not disrupted.

The House Republican caucus altered a 10-year-old rule requiring a leader who is indicted to relinquish his post. The move comes amid concern that House Majority Leader Tom DeLay might be indicted by a Texas prosecutor who has indicted two of Mr. DeLay’s top associates in connection with a battle over congressional redistricting in that state.

Democrats never had any rule similar to the Republican measure, which was one of several reforms adopted after the Republican Party captured control of Congress in 1994.

Republicans said yesterday’s change was not specifically instituted to protect Mr. DeLay, but described the old rule as an invitation to politically motivated prosecutions by Democrats.

“Today’s rule change will lessen the possibility of political exploitations that disrupt our House leadership,” said Rep. Henry Bonilla, the Texas Republican who spearheaded the change. “Today’s rule change will take a weapon away from partisan, media-hungry legal hacks.”

The new version of the rule — approved by voice vote after hours of caucus debate and despite several dissenting votes — would require a leader or committee chairman to step down only if convicted of a crime. In the case of indicted leaders, the Republican Steering Committee would review the indictment and make recommendations to the Republican conference, which could opt to act.

“It’s not up to some Democratic district attorney in Texas to make that decision; it’s up to the conference,” said Mr. DeLay, Texas Republican.

Republicans, however, weren’t unanimous on the change.

“I totally respect our leadership, top to bottom, but this sends the wrong message,” said Rep. Zach Wamp, a Tennessee Republican who voted against the rule change.

“I would have a hard time going to a community meeting and defending what we just did in this room,” said Rep. Christopher Shays, Connecticut Republican.

He called yesterday’s rule change an “erosion” of Republican promises to abide by “a higher standard.”

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee sent out press releases in 27 congressional districts yesterday, asking Republican members to explain why they supported the rule change.

“Today, Republicans sold their collective soul to maintain their grip on power,” said Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer, Maryland Democrat.

Mr. Hoyer, meanwhile, was re-elected to his post unanimously yesterday by House Democrats, as was House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat.

Democrats expressed confidence in their House leaders despite Election Day losses.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • ** FILE ** Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich speaks during a news conference on Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

    Questions surface on Gingrich campaign travel payments

    By Luke Rosiak - The Washington Times

    updated 59 minutes ago

  • This artist rendering shows Amine El Khalifi before U.S. District Judge T. Rawles Jones Jr. in federal court in Alexandria, Va., Friday, Feb. 17, 2012. El Khalifi, a 29-year-old Moroccan man was arrested Friday near the U.S. Capitol as he was planning to detonate what he thought was a suicide vest, given to him by FBI undercover operatives, said police and government officials. (AP Photo/Dana Verkouteren)

    Terror suspect arrested near U.S. Capitol

    By Tom Howell Jr. - The Washington Times

  • Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Associated Press)

    Justice says Supreme Court should revisit campaign finance

    By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Forbidden Table Talk

          Political satirist and Christian apologist Bob Siegel discusses religion and politics.

          The Political Pro-Con

          Not your typical discussion, writer Conor Murphy writes about the cons, and pros, of politics

          A Heart Without Compromise; Advocating for Children

          Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.