


The District’s proposed ballpark on the Anacostia River waterfront comes with 20 acres’ worth of land-acquisition headaches.
City officials identified a site near M and South Capitol streets in Southeast as their preferred location for a baseball stadium Tuesday if the city lands the relocated Montreal Expos. However, the District owns none of the land necessary to build the ballpark. The area is a haphazard mixture of vacant land, gas stations, storage facilities and industrial businesses.
The financing plan for the ballpark provides $65 million to purchase the necessary land. However, the $440 million total cost for the stadium will be much higher than what was projected in the spring, and it likely would rise further before the ballpark would be completed.
“There are still a lot of questions to be asked, and there is much to be learned yet about the financing. But this has a lot of promise, much more so than any of the other sites,” said D.C. Council member Sharon Ambrose, Ward 6 Democrat. “And I do think there is an opportunity to create more of the sort of things that MCI Center did. This also gets us much closer to the waterfront. Who thinks of D.C. as a waterfront town? There’s the sliver [of the Potomac River] in Georgetown everyone focuses on, but there’s all this frontage of the Anacostia we want to develop.”
The area south of the Mall is attractive to city planners because of its location near the Anacostia River and the massive development of the Anacostia Waterfront Initiative.
City leaders hope a stadium will aid that development, much as the construction of MCI Center helped fuel a bustling renaissance downtown.
But first, the District must win the relocation derby for the Expos, a process that after three agonizing years likely is entering its final days.
Major League Baseball’s executive council will meet today in Milwaukee to discuss the fate of the Expos. Baseball’s relocation committee is expected to recommend a new home for the club, and the District is regarded as the favorite, according to baseball sources familiar with the process.
A final decision is expected next week.
The rise of the M Street site as the preferred location for a stadium was unlikely, given the reluctance of tourists and local residents to venture south of the Mall.
Proposed ballpark sites at New York Avenue in Northeast and Benjamin Banneker Park in Southwest received far more scrutiny, and the M Street site was widely regarded as little more than a throw-in candidate.
However, the Banneker site was eliminated as an option because of difficult engineering requirements — it would have required building over Interstate 395 — and soaring costs.
The New York Avenue site was deemed to have more potential for development without baseball and did not meet with overwhelming enthusiasm among the members of the relocation committee.
“M Street is our best shot going forward,” said a source closely tied to the D.C. baseball effort.
If oriented on a northward fashion, following baseball custom, the M Street site would allow views of the Capitol dome.
View Entire StoryBy Mario Diaz
Left-coast judges rule Proposition 8 marriage backers driven by hostility

By Ralph Z. Hallow - The Washington Times
Bound by a common desire to deny President Obama a second term, restive activists gathering ...

By Dave Boyer - The Washington Times
Growing instability from Syria to Egypt highlights the Obama administration’s failure to develop a consistent ...

By Ben Wolfgang and Tim Devaney - The Washington Times
President Obama keeps tossing ideas to curb rising college tuition costs against the wall in ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

How does our 50th state view D.C. politics?

Great discoveries in the world of restaurants and chefs fulfill the quest for delicious food and cooking.

Despite cynicism about the law, it can provide you justice, protection, and ensure your rights. It can be exasperating, and at times, wildly entertaining.