Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Forum: The sacred, the secular and you

“The law is a ass, a idiot,” said parish beadle Mr. Bumble in Dickens’ “Oliver Twist.” People of faith today have every reason to reach a similar conclusion, as endless head-butting with the secular legal system seems to occur with dismaying regularity.

Whether the heartless inflexibility of the state and federal courts that discounted the moral dimensions of the Terri Schiavo case, or the long-running battles with secularists who want to remove every vestige of religion from the public square, cases pitting religion against secular forces grow apace.

Believers are tuned to every secular thrust: the drive to suppress Christmas in public schools; removal of the Ten Commandments from public buildings; objection to a teacher wearing a cross on a necklace; harassment of the Boy Scouts; banishment of Nativity scenes; removal of cross symbols from historical signs; release of a known killer because a juror consulted the Bible during a trial, and on and on.

A perverse image comes to mind — a vampire cowering in fear when the dreaded cross is flashed in front of him. Thus militant secularists recoil in horror when confronted with religious symbols in their everyday lives.

While believers and nonbelievers come in all different varieties, one wonders what the real reason for agnostics’ and atheists’ animus against religious beliefs and practices must be. Is it simply general discomfort, like a Michigan football fan in the midst of Ohio State partisans? Why would an atheist bring a case all the way to Supreme Court in an effort to strike the words “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance? Why would a father sue the Boy Scouts to force them admit his atheist son to their theistic ranks?

Pared of the usual smoke screen reasons — separation of church and state, discrimination, etc. — the root cause is mere hubris, the arrogant, overweening presumption of nonbelievers that they have the corner on truth.

Life is, as they say, too short for believers to worry about the trivial matters that set atheists vibrating: whether the Ten Commandments should hang in a schoolroom; if Frostie the Snowman must be included in a manger scene; or if Christmas carols should be removed from high-school choral repertories.

What bothers atheists and agnostics is that religious folks have some certainty about their beliefs — they believe in a higher power that interacts some with people. Nonbelievers have no such certainty, only doubts. More important, they resent the believers’ claim to certainty.

While believers really don’t care that there are atheists among them — except as souls to be saved, maybe — atheists can’t stand the fact there are so many believers. So they superciliously construe any public demonstrations or symbols of faith as an affront to their sensibilities — no more, no less.

But believers are concerned about the country’s increasing secularization. Since more than 80 percent of Americans claim to be religious, this process is driven by a minority using a misreading of the First Amendment. The tail wags the dog. It is an irony atheists claim the majority is intolerant, yet it is they who run to court to have their views prevail.

Believers maintain morality ultimately derives from God, Who has been revealed throughout history. In contrast, secularists believe moral issues can be resolved purely rationally.

These contradictory positions remain a mystery. Every person must reach his or her own answers based on religious teaching, philosophic questioning and personal experience.

The implications are vast for a society whose members and leaders are not informed by moral and ethical principles. Whether these derive from a Higher Power is an open question, and people will ultimately choose what they believe.

Finally, it would help if every truth-seeker would take a course in the philosophy of religion, which might bring some intellectual modesty to these matters. It might similarly reveal the truth of which Isaiah spoke, about how the people who walked in darkness have seen a great light.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • ** FILE ** Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich speaks during a news conference on Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

    Questions surface on Gingrich campaign travel payments

    By Luke Rosiak - The Washington Times

  • This artist rendering shows Amine El Khalifi before U.S. District Judge T. Rawles Jones Jr. in federal court in Alexandria, Va., Friday, Feb. 17, 2012. El Khalifi, a 29-year-old Moroccan man was arrested Friday near the U.S. Capitol as he was planning to detonate what he thought was a suicide vest, given to him by FBI undercover operatives, said police and government officials. (AP Photo/Dana Verkouteren)

    Terror suspect arrested near U.S. Capitol

    By Tom Howell Jr. - The Washington Times

  • Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Associated Press)

    Justice says Supreme Court should revisit campaign finance

    By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Media Migraine

          First over-the-counter column approved for fast and effective relief from even your worst media-induced headache.

          Forbidden Table Talk

          Political satirist and Christian apologist Bob Siegel discusses religion and politics.