Virginia's Pledge law sustained

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

RICHMOND -- A federal appeals court yesterday upheld a Virginia law requiring public schools to lead a daily recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance.

Edward Myers of Sterling, a father of three, claimed the reference to "one nation under God" in the Pledge was an unconstitutional promotion of religion.

A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, ruling that the Pledge is a patriotic exercise, not an affirmation of religion similar to a prayer.

"Undoubtedly, the pledge contains a religious phrase, and it is demeaning to persons of any faith to assert that the words 'under God' contain no religious significance," Judge Karen Williams wrote. "The inclusion of those two words, however, does not alter the nature of the pledge as a patriotic activity."

Mr. Myers and his attorney, David Remes, said they have not discussed whether to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

"If I don't move forward, what's my other choice? Withdraw from public school?" Mr. Myers asked.

Mr. Remes said the appeals court failed to examine the effect of the Pledge on children in a school setting.

"The problem is that young schoolchildren are quite likely to view the Pledge as affirming the existence of God and national subordination to God," Mr. Remes said.

Mr. Myers, a software engineer, belongs to the Anabaptist Mennonite faith, a Christian sect opposed to the mingling of church and state.

He challenged the Pledge law because of that belief and his fear that Loudoun County Public Schools was indoctrinating his sons with a "God and country" worldview.