- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
Pulling plug on Christmas
The baby in the Bethlehem manger has become politically incorrect and wishing someone “Merry Christmas” can be viewed as a civil rights violation, John Gibson argues in his book “The War on Christmas: How the Liberal Plot to Ban the Sacred Christian Holiday Is Worse Than You Thought.”
Mr. Gibson, host of “The Big Story” on Fox News Channel, says groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are attempting to “ban the sacred Christian holiday.” The following are excerpts of a telephone interview with Mr. Gibson:
Q: According to your subtitle, there’s a liberal plot to ban Christmas.
A: The liberal plot is ensconced in various places. … It’s a bunch of like-minded thinkers. You find it in the secular Humanist Manifesto No. 3, you find it in the pronouncements of the American Union for the Separation of Church and State, and you find it in the frequently-asked-questions sections of various ACLU Web sites. I call it a plot, in that they’re planning all this.
Here’s where I disagree with them. These guys are on the left side of the First Amendment. I don’t mean left-wing, politically. The phrase that says, “Congress shall make no law [respecting an establishment of] religion.” I tend to look at the right side, which follows the comma: “Nor prohibit the free exercise thereof.” And I think that when they argue that schools, public parks, libraries and city halls should consider a Christmas tree or Santa Claus as the celebration of religion, and therefore it has to be banned, that they are involved in the prohibition of free exercise. These are secular symbols.
Q: What are some examples of secularization?
A: The worst example of all of this is renaming things out of existence. You see this controversy this year about renaming the Christmas holiday as just “holidays,” renaming Christmas trees as a “holiday tree” or “friendship tree” or “giving tree.” Or, as Martha Stewart says, the “Mount Holly tree.” One of the big renaming projects in this country is renaming the Christmas break in schools to the “winter break.”
Q: You write that the ACLU has been providing the “legal muscle and pretzel logic” in the war. How are they doing that?
A: They threaten: “We’re willing to litigate this. We realize the court has not said this is illegal, but we’re willing to make a case for it nonetheless.” And if you follow the trail of crumbs, you arrive at a conclusion that they say this and they get away with it because organizations like schools and libraries and so forth are just afraid of incurring litigation costs and, perhaps, losing and having to pay the ACLU’s litigation costs.
Q: When people say “Happy holidays” instead of “Merry Christmas,” aren’t they just being polite? Where do you draw the line?
A: I draw the line at governmental action. There’s a whole bunch of stuff going on that are sort of social conventions about greetings. “Merry Christmas,” or “Happy holidays,” or “Happy Hanukkah” or “Happy Ramadan,” or whatever the expression might be. Coca-Cola doesn’t have Santa Claus on a label this year. …
The reason I draw the line here is these institutions can do what they want. A big retailer at a mall can do what they want. The public is also free not to go in or not patronize them. That’s different in a place where some petty official has the power to make the law. You see all this stuff going on in the malls, among retailers, and there’s been a big public outcry. And it’s been effective.
Q: You might expect Easter, with its emphasis on Resurrection, to come under heavier fire than Christmas. Why is Christmas the primary target?
A: Because it lasts so long, and it’s a big presence in our society. People have objections to it on other bases. For instance, the commercialization of it. … People want to say it’s overcommercialized. I don’t disagree. I don’t think, therefore, you can’t put up a Christmas tree in the school, or Santa can’t come visit the kids because he’s an overtly religious figure. Christmas comes under attack because it’s so pervasive, it has so many tentacles into the society. I can’t speak for Christians in general, but [Easter] seems like it might be, religiously, more important. But it goes by quickly. It happens and then it’s gone. Christmas lingers for an awfully long time. So it has kind of a big footprint on the calendar and it tends to irritate.
Q: Is Christmas the only holiday targeted in this way?
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Rand Paul wins 2014 CPAC straw poll, Ted Cruz finishes a distant second
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- EDITORIAL: As jobs vanish, Obama wants more of same
- Stolen European passports on Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777
- Obama engages in Ukraine diplomacy from Fla. resort as Russia digs in
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- PRUDEN: Likening Putin to Hitler on Ukraine shows Hillary's shaky grasp of history
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- Russias Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again