- Obama takes aim at ‘corporate deserters’
- Dick’s Sporting Goods lays off 478 PGA golf pros
- Senators: Cease-fire must allow Israel to defend against rockets, tunnels
- Sierra Leone doctor fighting Ebola catches disease
- Iraq welcomes Russian fighter jets, helicopter gunships into ISIL fight
- John McCain laments: Obama’s ‘self-pity … is really kind of sad’
- GOP offer to fix VA gives $10 billion in emergency funds
- Paul Ryan offers to repair U.S. economic safety net with a single grant stream
- Kim Jong-un builds bond with Putin: $250M Russia-backed addition to key port opens
- Pope Francis meets Meriam Ibrahim, a Sudanese woman sentenced to death
Pulling plug on Christmas
Question of the Day
The baby in the Bethlehem manger has become politically incorrect and wishing someone “Merry Christmas” can be viewed as a civil rights violation, John Gibson argues in his book “The War on Christmas: How the Liberal Plot to Ban the Sacred Christian Holiday Is Worse Than You Thought.”
Mr. Gibson, host of “The Big Story” on Fox News Channel, says groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are attempting to “ban the sacred Christian holiday.” The following are excerpts of a telephone interview with Mr. Gibson:
Q: According to your subtitle, there’s a liberal plot to ban Christmas.
A: The liberal plot is ensconced in various places. … It’s a bunch of like-minded thinkers. You find it in the secular Humanist Manifesto No. 3, you find it in the pronouncements of the American Union for the Separation of Church and State, and you find it in the frequently-asked-questions sections of various ACLU Web sites. I call it a plot, in that they’re planning all this.
Here’s where I disagree with them. These guys are on the left side of the First Amendment. I don’t mean left-wing, politically. The phrase that says, “Congress shall make no law [respecting an establishment of] religion.” I tend to look at the right side, which follows the comma: “Nor prohibit the free exercise thereof.” And I think that when they argue that schools, public parks, libraries and city halls should consider a Christmas tree or Santa Claus as the celebration of religion, and therefore it has to be banned, that they are involved in the prohibition of free exercise. These are secular symbols.
Q: What are some examples of secularization?
A: The worst example of all of this is renaming things out of existence. You see this controversy this year about renaming the Christmas holiday as just “holidays,” renaming Christmas trees as a “holiday tree” or “friendship tree” or “giving tree.” Or, as Martha Stewart says, the “Mount Holly tree.” One of the big renaming projects in this country is renaming the Christmas break in schools to the “winter break.”
Q: You write that the ACLU has been providing the “legal muscle and pretzel logic” in the war. How are they doing that?
A: They threaten: “We’re willing to litigate this. We realize the court has not said this is illegal, but we’re willing to make a case for it nonetheless.” And if you follow the trail of crumbs, you arrive at a conclusion that they say this and they get away with it because organizations like schools and libraries and so forth are just afraid of incurring litigation costs and, perhaps, losing and having to pay the ACLU’s litigation costs.
Q: When people say “Happy holidays” instead of “Merry Christmas,” aren’t they just being polite? Where do you draw the line?
A: I draw the line at governmental action. There’s a whole bunch of stuff going on that are sort of social conventions about greetings. “Merry Christmas,” or “Happy holidays,” or “Happy Hanukkah” or “Happy Ramadan,” or whatever the expression might be. Coca-Cola doesn’t have Santa Claus on a label this year. …
The reason I draw the line here is these institutions can do what they want. A big retailer at a mall can do what they want. The public is also free not to go in or not patronize them. That’s different in a place where some petty official has the power to make the law. You see all this stuff going on in the malls, among retailers, and there’s been a big public outcry. And it’s been effective.
Q: You might expect Easter, with its emphasis on Resurrection, to come under heavier fire than Christmas. Why is Christmas the primary target?
A: Because it lasts so long, and it’s a big presence in our society. People have objections to it on other bases. For instance, the commercialization of it. … People want to say it’s overcommercialized. I don’t disagree. I don’t think, therefore, you can’t put up a Christmas tree in the school, or Santa can’t come visit the kids because he’s an overtly religious figure. Christmas comes under attack because it’s so pervasive, it has so many tentacles into the society. I can’t speak for Christians in general, but [Easter] seems like it might be, religiously, more important. But it goes by quickly. It happens and then it’s gone. Christmas lingers for an awfully long time. So it has kind of a big footprint on the calendar and it tends to irritate.
Q: Is Christmas the only holiday targeted in this way?
By Michael Widlanski
Leveling the battlefield to aid terrorists enables evil to fight on
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Evidence shows Russia firing artillery into Ukraine: Pentagon
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Algerian plane diverted due to storms, second aircraft: 116 missing
- Cutler wins endorsement from gun control group
- 'Straight White Guy Festival' supposedly set for Ohio park
- HUSAIN: Fleeing Iraqi Christians find safe haven at the Shrine of Imam Ali
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq