- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
Major networks missed joy in Iraq
Question of the Day
Purple fingers, jubilation, hope and courage: Most news organizations offered positive and often uplifting coverage of the Iraqi elections in the past 48 hours.
Then, there were the holdouts.
“Dan Rather looked like he was about to burst into tears,” radio host Laura Ingraham said yesterday.
Indeed, the CBS newsman appeared initially mournful over news events that might reflect the success of White House plans to establish Iraq as a democratic stronghold in the Middle East.
“Fear is running high. … Bombs exploded at two Baghdad schools that are expected to serve as polling stations, and anti-election leaflets were everywhere threatening to, quote, ‘Wash the streets of Baghdad with the blood of voters,’” Mr. Rather told viewers.
He later began his main election report with more bad news: “More than 30 people died in insurgent attacks today.”
Habitual negativity can exact a toll on credibility, though.
“Most everyone had positive reports, particularly on cable. But there were glaring exceptions who emphasized violence or uncertainty,” said Brent Baker of the Alexandria-based Media Research Center.
“Reporters look bad when they insist on being dour and sour when actual images on TV screens are so happy and thrilling,” Mr. Baker said. “These correspondents look out of touch, grasping the negative so hard.”
Such reporting caps off weeks of critical coverage, which often predicted the worst outcome for Iraq, Mr. Baker said.
“But in the end, these correspondents just couldn’t compete with such powerful, positive images,” he added.
Mr. Rather was not the only gloomy anchor as the election coverage unfolded.
ABC’s Peter Jennings noted Sunday, “All over Baghdad today, there is no question that it looked like an occupation.”
He later observed that in Sunni regions, “The election process has been rejected. Somehow, the future here is still pretty bleak.”
Even after the Baghdad polling places had closed, NBC’s Brian Williams detected “general unease,” calling the events “a fairly unquantifiable election so far.”
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- EPSTEIN: All IRS roads lead to the archivist
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- KUHNER: Will Russia-Ukraine be Europe's next war?
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq