- JetBlue pilots vote to unionize; 2 previous attempts failed
- Pentagon plans to replace flight crews with ‘full-time’ robots
- Navy’s military dolphins may meet Putin’s porpoises in Black Sea
- Forget the Porsche — it’s the guy with the Prius that attracts the ladies, poll shows
- Fired Russian Facebook CEO says site has fallen in the hands of pro-Putin supporters
- Sen. Boozman of Arkansas has emergency heart surgery
- Brazil embraces drones to save the Amazon rain forest
- Teen stowaway shows holes in vast airport security
- Supreme Court to decide if passports can say ‘Jerusalem, Israel’
- Cries of anguish as South Korea ferry toll tops 100
Major networks missed joy in Iraq
Purple fingers, jubilation, hope and courage: Most news organizations offered positive and often uplifting coverage of the Iraqi elections in the past 48 hours.
Then, there were the holdouts.
“Dan Rather looked like he was about to burst into tears,” radio host Laura Ingraham said yesterday.
Indeed, the CBS newsman appeared initially mournful over news events that might reflect the success of White House plans to establish Iraq as a democratic stronghold in the Middle East.
“Fear is running high. … Bombs exploded at two Baghdad schools that are expected to serve as polling stations, and anti-election leaflets were everywhere threatening to, quote, ‘Wash the streets of Baghdad with the blood of voters,’” Mr. Rather told viewers.
He later began his main election report with more bad news: “More than 30 people died in insurgent attacks today.”
Habitual negativity can exact a toll on credibility, though.
“Most everyone had positive reports, particularly on cable. But there were glaring exceptions who emphasized violence or uncertainty,” said Brent Baker of the Alexandria-based Media Research Center.
“Reporters look bad when they insist on being dour and sour when actual images on TV screens are so happy and thrilling,” Mr. Baker said. “These correspondents look out of touch, grasping the negative so hard.”
Such reporting caps off weeks of critical coverage, which often predicted the worst outcome for Iraq, Mr. Baker said.
“But in the end, these correspondents just couldn’t compete with such powerful, positive images,” he added.
Mr. Rather was not the only gloomy anchor as the election coverage unfolded.
ABC’s Peter Jennings noted Sunday, “All over Baghdad today, there is no question that it looked like an occupation.”
He later observed that in Sunni regions, “The election process has been rejected. Somehow, the future here is still pretty bleak.”
Even after the Baghdad polling places had closed, NBC’s Brian Williams detected “general unease,” calling the events “a fairly unquantifiable election so far.”
Feds who send arms against ranch families betray American values
- CARSON: When government looks more like foe than friend
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, renegade
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- IRS revokes conservative group's tax-exempt status over anti-Clinton statements: report
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- Michelle Obama: Obama family Sundays are more for napping than church
- Vice reporter Simon Ostrovsky being held by east Ukraine militants: report
- Bonuses given to IRS employes who owed back taxes
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.