The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • World

    White House urged to end Israel row on settlements

  • Politics

    Senate approves modest earmark cut

  • Environment

    Poll: Fewer Americans worry about global warming

  • Security

    Napolitano shifts policy on border fence

  • Business

    Ireland's economic woes leave Emerald Isle blue

  • National

    FISHER: Socialism American style

  • Security

    Tehran aiding al Qaeda links, Petraeus says

Tuesday, January 11, 2005

Despite pressure, Bush vows 'no women in combat'

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Stories

  • Senate approves modest earmark cut
  • Napolitano shifts policy on border fence
  • Ireland's economic woes leave Emerald Isle blue
  • Tehran aiding al Qaeda links, Petraeus says

By

President Bush's policy on women in ground combat takes just four words to articulate: "No women in combat."

Despite extended tours of duties in Iraq for soldiers and an Army examination of women's roles, the president told editors and reporters of The Washington Times yesterday in an interview in the Oval Office that he has no intention of sending women into ground combat, a mission for which they are banned under Pentagon policy.

Some retired generals and commentators have called on the president to increase significantly the 150,000 troops in Iraq. Mr. Bush said he is relying on his generals not the pundits to dictate the makeup of the force.

"The troop size in Iraq is not driven here in the White House," he said. "It is driven by the decisions and the recommendations the recommendations of John Abizaid and Gen. George Casey . And it's really important that that's how a war be fought, that and I would hope it brings great comfort to you as a concerned citizen the commander in chief makes the military decisions based upon the recommendations from the field."

The active force is about 1.4 million troops. The Army has added 30,000 soldiers, using emergency powers, to exceed 500,000.

"As far as the overall force structure and the relationship between the active-duty unit and the Guard and reserve, for example, that's part of the transformation of our military," Mr. Bush said. "In other words, transforming our military to meet a whole new set of threats. And the debate I hear is not overall size, necessarily, but the relationship between the Army to the Air Force and the Navy."

Asked about reports of putting women closer to land combat, the president said:

"There's no change of policy as far as I'm concerned. No women in combat. Having said that, let me explain, we've got to make sure we define combat properly: We've got women flying choppers and women flying fighters, which I'm perfectly content with."

The question came up in light of the Army's transforming its 10 active-combat divisions and re-examining women's roles. Instead of the normal three brigades per division, each division will have four or more "units of action." They are being designed to train and deploy as one modular unit, with combat and support units as one.

Therein lies the potential problem. Pentagon policy not only bans women from direct combat brigades, such as infantry or armor, it also says they cannot join support units that collocate with those units.

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. WOLF: Questions for your representative
  2. E-mails suggested Fort Hood suspect subpar for Army
  3. Social Security IOUs stashed away
  4. PRUDEN: The suicide mission for the Democrats
  5. EDITORIAL: Obama nominee's sympathy for sexual sadists
More Top Stories »
  1. BLANKLEY: Our sturdy system of governance
  2. WOLF: Obama family health care fracas
  3. Guilty plea may not hurt BAE's U.S. arm
  4. Justice, CIA clash over probe of interrogator IDs
  5. Temporary foreign workers threaten immigration deal

Most Commented

  1. GOP to use amendments as tactic
  2. Obama hones final health care pitch
  3. E-mails suggested Fort Hood suspect subpar for Army
  4. Temporary foreign workers threaten immigration deal
  5. Justice, CIA clash over probe of interrogator IDs
More Top Stories »
  1. GOP blasts Democrats over health bill tactic
  2. EDITORIAL: Obama's sick obsession
  3. GOP move on pork pressures Obama
  4. Obama humanizes health debate in final push
  5. Dodd introduces financial reform legislation

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Slaughter says her solution is 'constitutional'

  • Belief Blog

    Sayonara to the president's faith-based council

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.