Rice gets nod from Senate panel

Condoleezza Rice’s nomination as secretary of state easily cleared the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on a 16-2 vote yesterday but Democrats stepped in to delay confirmation by the full Senate, which had been expected today.

On the eve of President Bush’s second inauguration, Democratic Sens. Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia and Barbara Boxer of California moved to postpone the vote, possibly until next week.

Mr. Byrd said he and other Democrats will demand more time to review the transcript of Miss Rice’s testimony.

“Rushing the nomination through the Senate would undermine the constitutional responsibility that the framers placed on senators,” Mr. Byrd’s office said.

A spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada said the Democrats would not try to block Miss Rice’s confirmation, and he predicted the vote would come Wednesday.

Sen. George Allen, Virginia Republican, called the move “absurd, petty obstructionism” and said it sets the wrong tone for the beginning of a new administration.

He and other Republicans, however, said they have little choice but to acquiesce.

“Obviously, it’s their right,” said Amy Call, a spokeswoman for Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, Tennessee Republican.

But she questioned the decision, noting that outgoing Secretary of State Colin L. Powell was confirmed unanimously on the day of President Bush’s first inauguration four years ago.

In 1997, Madeleine K. Albright’s nomination as President Clinton’s secretary of state was approved by the Foreign Relations Committee on Inauguration Day, then confirmed 99-0 two days later by the full Senate.

During the hearing yesterday, Miss Rice said the administration had made some “bad decisions” during its first term, including on Iraq and particularly on postwar reconstruction.

“We have made a lot of decisions in this period of time. Some of them have been good, some of them have not been good, some of them have been bad decisions, I’m sure. We didn’t have the right skills, the right capacity to deal with a reconstruction effort of this kind,” she said.

Miss Rice did not specify the mistakes.

She said: “I know enough about history to stand back and to recognize that you judge decisions not at the moment, but in how it all adds up. It’s how Iraq turns out that really ultimately matters.”

For the second day, Mrs. Boxer, one of the two committee members who voted against the nomination, used the hearings to accuse the Bush administration, and Miss Rice personally, of having misled the nation in the run-up to the war in Iraq.

Story Continues →