

RICHMOND — Lawmakers will consider a bill that would forbid homosexuals from adopting children.
Delegate Richard H. Black has proposed a bill that would add new criteria for adoption reports filed with the circuit court. The Loudoun County Republican’s bill amends the state’s adoption law by adding a phrase that states: “No person under this statute may adopt if that person is a homosexual.”
Current law permits any person or married couple residing in the state to petition to adopt.
Herb Lux, Mr. Black’s legislative assistant, said the measure would require investigators during the screening process to ask an adoption candidate whether he or she is a homosexual.
Investigators also check out, among other things, an adoption candidate’s health, whether he or she has a criminal record and whether he or she is fit to be a parent.
The bill is pending in the House Health, Welfare and Institutions Committee.
Equality Virginia, the state’s primary homosexual rights group, opposes Mr. Black’s bill.
“Our primary concern is that it would keep hundreds if not thousands of adoptable children from good homes,” said Dyana Mason, the group’s executive director. “It’s a disingenuous argument to make that two loving people can’t commit to raising a healthy child. That’s just wrong.”
Miss Mason also said studies show that “children being raised in homes with gay parents are turning out just fine, thank you very much.”
Delegate Robert G. Marshall, Manassas Republican who is a co-patron of the bill, said the proposed restriction is necessary.
“The order of nature strongly suggests a father and mother are necessary for proper development of a child and that means a heterosexual relationship,” he said.
On its Web site, Equality Virginia claims that the state courts have discriminated against homosexual parents in the past by ruling that because the parent was a homosexual, it was not in the child’s best interests for the parent to have custody.
A measure to write a ban on gay “marriage” into Virginia’s Constitution advanced easily yesterday to the full Senate despite the passionate, often poignant appeals by opponents.
The Senate Privileges and Elections Committee endorsed the legislation on an 11-3 vote, rejecting opponents’ arguments that the constitutional amendment could create legal headaches in Virginia.
View Entire StoryBy H. Leighton Steward
Fantasy replaces reality in Obama's green economy

By George Jahn - Associated Press
Iran is poised to greatly expand uranium enrichment at a fortified underground bunker to a ...

By Nekesa Mumbi - Associated Press
Clapping hands and swaying to gospel hymns in the church where Whitney Houston’s powerful voice ...

By Chris Kahn - Associated Press
Gasoline prices have never been higher this time of the year. At $3.53 a gallon, ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

First over-the-counter column approved for fast and effective relief from even your worst media-induced headache.

History doesn't have to be grim; there is a lot to be learned from the pages of time.

Political satirist and Christian apologist Bob Siegel discusses religion and politics.