- Top federal judge uses pizza to explain complex Obamacare situation
- Obama, Biden overhaul job training programs
- Drought-plagued Californians turn to paint to keep lawns green
- ISIL now forcing Iraqi shopkeepers to veil mannequins in Mosul
- 11 parents of Nigeria’s abducted girls die
- Genetic mapping triggers new hope on schizophrenia
- Turkish P.M. Erdogan won’t speak to Obama, but he’ll take calls from Biden
- Israel’s ambassador praises Obama, slams Human Rights Watch report
- Md. parents accused of locking up autistic twin sons
- Dancing Kim Jong-un video sparks North Korea fury
Burr aims to solve health care ‘crisis’
Question of the Day
The man who filled John Edwards’ Senate seat stands in stark contrast to the personal injury attorney and failed vice-presidential candidate.
North Carolina Republican Sen. Richard M. Burr favors reforms in the legal system to rein in medical malpractice lawsuits, which he blames for the inflation in medical costs.
“The health care crisis, I believe, is the number one issue,” Mr. Burr said in an interview with The Washington Times.
Mr. Edwards made millions suing doctors and hospitals. He blamed skyrocketing health care costs on insurance companies and dismissed all of the aggressive Republican plans for tort reform stalled in Congress.
Mr. Burr said the rising health care costs have driven many doctors out of business — especially in rural areas — leaving many North Carolinians without health care.
“If you go into labor, you’re going to go to the doctor even if you have to drive 60 miles,” he said. “But if you’re pregnant and need prenatal care, you might not drive that far.”
Mr. Burr also remains open-minded about dealing with the malpractice insurance premiums doctors pay.
“If we can’t come up with legislation to moderate that, then the federal government could create an independent fund to deal with that,” he said. “We do it with flood insurance.”
Mr. Burr’s campaign against second-time Democratic Senate nominee Erskine Bowles — who once served as chief of staff to President Clinton — was about far more than just tort reform.
“Their discourse in the campaign really focused on jobs, the Iraq war and Social Security reform,” said Tim Vercellotti, polling director for Elon University in North Carolina. “And really, there weren’t that many differences between the two on those issues.”
Mainly, the two fought over whose “fair trade” stance was more solid, who deserved more credit for the federal tobacco buyout and who had closer ties to Mr. Clinton.
“I’m sure there were some areas of the state where people saw those ads [about Mr. Bowles’ service under Mr. Clinton] and said, ‘Well, that’s all I need to know,’” Mr. Vercellotti said.
Like several new Senate Republicans, Mr. Burr is one of the 1994 House revolutionaries and hopes to bring a little of that spark to the slow and meandering Senate.
“There’s frustration by many voters that Washington talks a lot but does very little,” he said.
He was asked about fixing Social Security, which is expected to become insolvent in as few as 15 years. Should the government cut benefits, raise taxes or raise the retirement age? He said he wants to find “a fourth option.”
U.S. appetite for drugs begets violence migrants are fleeing
- Obamacare dealt massive setback by federal appeals court
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- Rep. Jared Polis' anti-fracking crusade riles Colorado
- Jewish woman booted from JetBlue flight over fight with Palestinian
- Hamas terrorists wear Israeli army uniforms to ambush soldiers in Gaza
- LYONS: Small-arms treaty, big Second Amendment threat
- YOUNG: A sinking presidency, deeper after November?
- Obama family set to buy $4.25M desert home in California: report
- PRUDEN: A deadly enemy within exacerbating immigration crisis
- MERRY: Handicaps in Hillary's way
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq