- Prince Charles: Muslims are driving Christians from Mideast through persecution
- Gitmo’s first commander: Close the prison down
- Google’s newest photography find: Just wink and shoot
- Detroit’s Heidelberg art project hit by 8 fires in 8 months
- Pa. police pull people over for random DNA tests for feds
- NASA pushing hard to get back into space game
- Harvard student to face federal charges for bomb hoax
- Ronnie Biggs of ‘Great Train Robbery’ fame dies, 84
- Pope Francis wins another ‘Person of the Year’ — from gay rights magazine
- Rep. Steve Stockman: Give my campaign $10, and you’ll get an Obama barf bag
Army stretched thin, report says
Deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan have stretched the U.S. Army so thin that its ability to retain and recruit soldiers is threatened, according to an Army-sponsored report released yesterday.
The report by the Rand Corp.'s Arroyo Center -- the Army's federally funded research institute -- said "no quick fix" is in sight and is the service's most public acknowledgment so far of the burden exacted on forces by the war on terror. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld has publicly rejected the notion that troops are stretched too thin to win the war.
However, the report comes as the Pentagon considers dropping its long-standing "two-war strategy" -- the Cold War doctrine saying the United States must be ready to fight two major wars at the same time.
It says Army plans to restructure into a larger number of more mobile brigades in the coming years will help ease the strain caused by Iraq and Afghanistan deployments. But, it adds, even after such restructuring, "problems will remain."
Noting that many active-duty combat units already are spending more than one out of every two years deployed to foreign battlefields, the report says long-term options for improving the situation include relying more on the Army National Guard or expanding the number of Army combat brigades. One combat brigade consists of about 3,500 soldiers.
Citing "considerable strain" on the Army, the report says the service could face "serious problems" if current deployments are not eased.
"The challenge the Army faces is profound," said Lynn Davis, a senior Rand analyst and lead author of the report. "Any approach is fraught with risks and uncertainties, along with significant costs and some possible changes in the Army's long-term goals."
By John R. Bolton
The president fiddles at his domestic altar while the world burns
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- Top Democrats reject court ruling over NSA spying on Americans
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- PRUDEN: The scam that will not die
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- HURT: D.C. gets the vapors, calls sequester too much
- Obama mocks Putin, picks gay athletes for Sochi delegation
- Colorado revolt: 55 of 62 sheriffs refuse to enforce new gun laws
- Senators in rush to pass budget vow to undo cut to military retirement pay
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
Uncensored exploration of issues concerning current events, civil liberties, American political advocacy, and the political and social issues facing military veterans.
NFL junkie Eric Golub reports on his favorite obsession. There is no football offseason. Every February he pretends to care about other sports while sobbing uncontrollably each Sunday until September.
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up by Lisa King Dolloff and friends.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow