Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Defeat NAFTA

Using the Clinton playbook for enacting NAFTA in 1993, the White House is twisting arms and buying votes to win passage of the Central American Free Trade Agreement.

And the seductive song the White House is singing sounds familiar. It is the NAFTA theme song. CAFTA will ease the social pressures that have produced waves of illegal aliens. CAFTA will increase U.S. exports. CAFTA will not cost U.S. jobs. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

If Tom Delay’s caucus delivers 200 votes for CAFTA, economic patriots will begin to look outside the GOP for leadership.

In 1993, Republicans, by four to one, signed on to NAFTA. They believed the promises that our $5 billion trade surplus with Mexico would grow and illegal immigration would diminish. They were deceived. The NAFTAskepticswere proven right. The U.S. trade surplus with Mexico vanished overnight. Last year, we ran a $50 billion trade deficit. Since 1993, 15 million illegal aliens have been caught breaking into the United States. Five million made it, and their soaring demands for social services have driven California to bankruptcy. As for Mexico’s major exports to us, they appear to be two: narcotics and Mexicans.

With Middle Easterners turning up on the Rio Grande, patriotic Minutemen are patrolling the borderbecausePresidentGeorge Bush will not enforce our immigration laws. Who can believe this White House is serious, then, about halting the invasion from the Caribbean and Central America? It is time for Republicans who represent a Middle America that never wanted NAFTA to tell the White House the old talking points will no longer do. The open-borders, free-trade ideology of Mr. Clinton and Mr. Bush has run its course and begun to endanger our national existence.

Today, “free trade” is about something other than the simple exchange of goods. Henry Kissinger tipped the Trilateralists’ hand in 1993 when he wrote that NAFTA was the “architecture of a new international system,” a great “step forward toward the new world order.” Today’s trade agreements are about reshaping the world to conform to the demands of transnational corporations that have shed their national identities and loyalties and want to shed their U.S. workers. Tired of contributing to Medicare and Social Security and having to deal with Americans who need health care and pension benefits, they want to dump them all and hire Asians who will work for $2 an hour.

Trade treaties have become enabling acts by which global companies desert their home countries. CAFTA will enable U.S. firms to shut down factories here, lay off their labor force and hire Dominicans and Costa Ricans, but retain free access to the U.S. market. They get to fire their American workers and keep their American consumers. What a deal.

NAFTA and CAFTA are the shield laws of corporate absconders.

What these companies want ultimately is a world government that will protect their absolute freedom to go where they wish and do what they want, the country be d–—.

Before Republicans go down to the well of the House and vote for CAFTA, they need to look at what has already happened to America.

Under Mr. Bush, 3 million manufacturing jobs have disappeared, one in every six. States like Pennsylvania, Michigan and Illinois that went for Ronald Reagan twice are gone. A shift of 60,000 votes in the GOP bastion of Ohio, and John Kerry would be president.

The U.S. trade deficit in 2005 will exceed $700 billion, 6 percent of our entire economy. We are awash in foreign debt.

With China, our trade deficit last year was $162 billion. Beijing is using its trade surplus to buy U.S. bonds, giving her a giant claim on U.S. interest payments and to build and buy the ships, planes and missiles needed to fight a naval war off her coast. Wal-Mart is subsidizing China’s strategic buildup.

The industries we are losing now are not only textiles, shoes, TVs and toys, but autos, airplanes and computers. We are no longer the self- sufficient nation of 1940 or 1960. Even American sovereignty is being eroded, as the World Trade Organization orders Congress to change U.S. tax and trade laws, and Congress meekly complies.

America can yet turn this around, but we are reaching a tipping point where a sovereign, independent and self-sufficient American republic will cease to be.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • ** FILE ** In this May 8, 2012, file photo, President Barack Obama speaks in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)

    Obama camp hits Romney over class size

  • **FILE** Jeffrey Neely, the central figure in a General Services Administration spending scandal, sits at the witness table as the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform investigates wasteful spending and excesses by GSA during a 2010 Las Vegas conference, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, April 16, 2012. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

    Key figure in lavish Vegas junket leaves GSA

  • Former President Bill Clinton (AP photo)

    In campaign twist, Romney camp plays Clinton card against Obama

  • Celebrities In The News
  • ** FILE ** In this file photo from 2008, Keira Knightley is the title character, an 18th-century aristocrat ahead of her time, in "The Duchess."

    Keira Knightley: Engaged to Klaxons’ keyboardist

  • ** FILE ** In this March 15, 2000, file photo, master flatpicker Doc Watson, talks about his long and successful musical career at his home in Deep Gap, N.C. Watson was in critical condition Thursday, May 24, 2012, at a North Carolina hospital after falling at his home in Deep Gap earlier this week. (AP Photo/Karen Tam, File)

    Doc Watson: Folk musician in critical condition at N.C. hospital

  • ** FILE ** In this Nov. 9, 2011, file photo, singer Gregg Allman arrives at the 45th Annual CMA Awards in Nashville, Tenn. (AP Photo/Evan Agostini, file)

    Gregg Allman: Engaged to 24-year-old girlfriend

  • Happening Now