Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

House OKs association health plans

The House yesterday approved a bill that would give major trade associations the power to pool their members nationwide and buy discounted health insurance that is not governed by state regulations.

The House voted 263-165 on the “association health plans,” which are backed by the Bush administration.

Similar measures have been introduced in the Congress for the past decade. Several have passed the House, but none has made it through the Senate.

The current bill allows trade groups, chambers of commerce and other business organizations to bargain for health care coverage that crosses state lines. The health plans will be regulated by federal laws.

Most labor unions and large corporations purchase their health insurance under those rules, said Rep. Sam Johnson, Texas Republican and sponsor of the bill.

“Small businesses will save as much as 30 percent on their health insurance” by grouping under an association health plan, Mr. Johnson said on the House floor during yesterday’s debate.

But other lawmakers and consumer groups argued that consumers under the health plans would lose state consumer protections and certain services because federal law does not mandate them.

State requirements for coverage of services like diabetes treatments and breast-cancer screenings could be eliminated under the health plans, said Carmen Balber, spokeswoman for the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, a Santa Monica, Calif., consumer advocacy group.

“This bill does pre-empt consumer protections provided by the states,” said Rep. Ron Kind, Wisconsin Democrat.

Association health plans would be regulated by the federal Department of Labor rather than state insurance commissioners.

But unlike the states, the federal agency does not have the power to immediately shut down a fraudulent insurance plan. Instead, the Labor Department must file a lawsuit in federal court and win the case to take action.

The debate on the bill comes as the House is scheduled to vote on several health bills this week.

The House is expected to vote tomorrow on a medical tort-reform bill that would put a $250,000 cap on noneconomic damages for medical-malpractice cases.

Other bills that are expected to get a House vote this week would extend federal funding for high-risk insurance policies that are run by the states and set up tax credits for consumers who use health savings accounts.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • **FILE** Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (Associated Press)

    Sanctions may be changing Iran’s nuke plans

    By Shaun Waterman - The Washington Times

  • David Wilmot, a power player in the District, is using a program to aid the economically disadvantaged to win contracts. (Barbara L. Salisbury/The Washington Times)

    Top D.C. lobbyist says he deserves special aid

    By Jeffrey Anderson - The Washington Times

  • Washington state Gov. Chris Gregoire is surrounded by legislators and others Monday as she signs into law a bill legalizing same-sex marriage. The law is to take effect June 7, but opponents are mounting a repeal effort. (Associated Press)

    Washington ballot best chance for foes of same-sex marriage

    By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Hail Mary Food of Grace

          Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.

          Ad Lib

          Are there profound differences between the Left and the Right? You betcha.

          Talking Sense

          We’re human: we don’t always think things through, so we accept many ideas that are, well, ideas that are wrong. We also look past certain truths without recognizing them.