- Al Gore’s climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
- Army’s 3-D printed bombs will create ‘a whole new universe’ of deadly capabilities
- Hamas calls on Hezbollah to join in fight against Israel
- Senators to FIFA, others: Don’t reward Putin with the World Cup in 2018
- U.S. condemns Israeli shelling of shelter in Gaza
- Obamacare shoots premiums up by 88 percent in California
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- Obama to Republicans: ‘Stop just hatin’ all the time’
- U.S. chemical sites vulnerable despite millions spent on security: Congress
- Driverless cars to hit the British streets by 2015
Durbin disputes column on Roberts
Question of the Day
Judge John G. Roberts Jr.’s rounds on Capitol Hill have resulted in a “he said/he said” spat between a senator with whom the judge spoke on Friday and a law professor’s account of how that conversation touched on abortion.
In a column in yesterday’s Los Angeles Times, George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley said Judge Roberts told Sen. Richard J. Durbin, Illinois Democrat, that he would recuse himself from deciding cases where the Constitution conflicted with Catholic teaching.
“According to two people who attended the meeting, Roberts was asked by [Mr. Durbin] what he would do if the law required a ruling that his church considers immoral,” Mr. Turley wrote. “Roberts is a devout Catholic and … the Catholic Church considers abortion to be a sin, and various church leaders have stated that government officials supporting abortion should be denied religious rites such as communion.”
“Roberts appeared nonplused and, according to sources in the meeting, answered after a long pause that he would probably have to recuse himself,” wrote Mr. Turley, who added that it was “the wrong answer.”
Both sides of the confirmation fight leaped on the exchange.
Mr. Turley and others said it showed that Judge Roberts is unable to divorce himself from his religion while making rulings. Others viewed it as proof that Democrats such as Mr. Durbin — who also is Catholic — have a religious litmus test that would prevent them from supporting any devout Catholic to the federal bench.
The exchange “smacks of a religious test for judicial office, which is offensive to all Americans — whatever their religious beliefs,” said Wendy E. Long, counsel to the conservative Judicial Confirmation Network.
But some of the outrage came from Mr. Durbin’s office.
“Jonathan Turley’s column is not accurate,” Durbin press secretary Joe Shoemaker said, adding that his boss never asked that question and Judge Roberts never said he would recuse himself in such a case.
“Judge Roberts said repeatedly that he would follow the rule of law,” Mr. Shoemaker said.
Sen. John Cornyn, Texas Republican, met with Judge Roberts yesterday and said he asked him about the column.
“There is no conflict for Judge Roberts,” Mr. Cornyn said later. “He assured me that he would not have any difficulties ruling on such issues.”
Disagreement also came on who leaked the exchange.
“I don’t know who was his source,” Mr. Shoemaker said. “Whoever the source was either got it wrong or Jonathan Turley got it wrong.”
Mr. Turley, contacted by The Washington Times yesterday, said his sources were Mr. Durbin and Mr. Shoemaker.
- Geraldo Rivera: Matt Drudge 'doing his best to stir up a civil war'
- Lois Lerner hated conservatives, new emails show
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- HURT: Impeaching Obama is a losing strategy for the GOP
- CARSON: Rudderless U.S. foreign policy
- Patent workers paid to exercise, shop, do chores: report
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- Fla. mom arrested for allowing 7-year-old son to walk to park alone
- Senate overcomes first filibuster of Obama's border-spending bill
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world