- Unbeliebable: White House turns Bieber petition response into immigration screed
- Obama signs law denying Iran ambassador’s visa, but says law is ‘advisory’
- Mich. judge to laughing convicted killer: ‘I hope you die in prison’
- Man charged in Kansas City-area highway shootings
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
Durbin disputes column on Roberts
Judge John G. Roberts Jr.’s rounds on Capitol Hill have resulted in a “he said/he said” spat between a senator with whom the judge spoke on Friday and a law professor’s account of how that conversation touched on abortion.
In a column in yesterday’s Los Angeles Times, George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley said Judge Roberts told Sen. Richard J. Durbin, Illinois Democrat, that he would recuse himself from deciding cases where the Constitution conflicted with Catholic teaching.
“According to two people who attended the meeting, Roberts was asked by [Mr. Durbin] what he would do if the law required a ruling that his church considers immoral,” Mr. Turley wrote. “Roberts is a devout Catholic and … the Catholic Church considers abortion to be a sin, and various church leaders have stated that government officials supporting abortion should be denied religious rites such as communion.”
“Roberts appeared nonplused and, according to sources in the meeting, answered after a long pause that he would probably have to recuse himself,” wrote Mr. Turley, who added that it was “the wrong answer.”
Both sides of the confirmation fight leaped on the exchange.
Mr. Turley and others said it showed that Judge Roberts is unable to divorce himself from his religion while making rulings. Others viewed it as proof that Democrats such as Mr. Durbin — who also is Catholic — have a religious litmus test that would prevent them from supporting any devout Catholic to the federal bench.
The exchange “smacks of a religious test for judicial office, which is offensive to all Americans — whatever their religious beliefs,” said Wendy E. Long, counsel to the conservative Judicial Confirmation Network.
But some of the outrage came from Mr. Durbin’s office.
“Jonathan Turley’s column is not accurate,” Durbin press secretary Joe Shoemaker said, adding that his boss never asked that question and Judge Roberts never said he would recuse himself in such a case.
“Judge Roberts said repeatedly that he would follow the rule of law,” Mr. Shoemaker said.
Sen. John Cornyn, Texas Republican, met with Judge Roberts yesterday and said he asked him about the column.
“There is no conflict for Judge Roberts,” Mr. Cornyn said later. “He assured me that he would not have any difficulties ruling on such issues.”
Disagreement also came on who leaked the exchange.
“I don’t know who was his source,” Mr. Shoemaker said. “Whoever the source was either got it wrong or Jonathan Turley got it wrong.”
Mr. Turley, contacted by The Washington Times yesterday, said his sources were Mr. Durbin and Mr. Shoemaker.
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- Justice at last: 'Evil woman' outed for grabbing girl's game ball
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- 'Deport Bieber' petition draws no comment from White House
- EDITORIAL: Mark Warner running scared?
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.