The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Politics

    Voight, tea party groups plan last-minute protest

  • Politics

    CURL: Obama the Innocent stumps for health care

  • Politics

    Key Democrat Boccieri switches to 'yes' on health vote

  • Commentary

    TURNER: Our lawbreaking Congress

  • Energy

    Obama backs plan to legalize illegals

  • World

    Gitmo suspects allowed laptops

  • Politics

    Health-vote ally Nelson to get new VA hospital for Nebraska

Wednesday, July 27, 2005

Democrats seek view on Roe from Roberts

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Stories

  • Thousands rally on anniversary of Iraq invasion
  • Voight, tea party groups plan last-minute protest
  • Judge rejects settlement for 9/11 rescuers
  • URS, Minnesota settle suit over bridge collapse

By

Two key Senate Democrats yesterday said that federal Judge John G. Roberts Jr. will have a hard time being confirmed to the Supreme Court if he doesn't publicly state his position on past court cases such as the one that established abortion rights.

Vermont Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, said he doubts that Judge Roberts can be confirmed unless he agrees that Roe v. Wade -- the 1973 abortion case -- is "settled law."

And in a speech yesterday at the National Press Club, Sen. Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat and committee member, listed three "troubling" pitfalls that could upend Judge Roberts' nomination. The No. 2 pitfall was Judge Roberts' reluctance to discuss specific Supreme Court cases -- even ones that might resurface before the court.

Republicans responded that the statements were hypocritical and called the comments proof that some Democrats are using a single-issue "litmus test" to determine Judge Roberts' fitness for the bench.

The Republican National Committee (RNC) issued a press statement accompanied by several quotes condemning litmus tests made by Mr. Leahy when President Clinton, a fellow Democrat, was in the White House.

"Senator Leahy's eagerness to embrace the very litmus tests he has opposed in the past is the height of hypocrisy," RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman said. "It is clear that Senator Leahy is more concerned with appeasing the left wing of his party than giving John Roberts a fair confirmation hearing."

In an interview broadcast yesterday on Vermont Public Radio, Mr. Leahy said he would vote against Judge Roberts if he determines that the nominee would pursue the same "active" agenda as conservative Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.

"I want to find out if he's going to be as active as this -- as people like Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas, who have almost willy-nilly overruled things," he said, according to an Associated Press report from Vermont.

Specifically, Mr. Leahy said, Judge Roberts will have a hard time being confirmed if he doesn't pledge to uphold Roe v. Wade, which declared abortion a constitutional right.

"I don't see how somebody who said they didn't consider Roe v. Wade settled law ... I don't see how they get confirmed," he said. Mr. Leahy compared the primacy of Roe to Brown v. Board of Education, which outlawed racial segregation.

12Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. KUHNER: Impeach the president?
  2. EDITORIAL: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow
  3. Obama backs plan to legalize illegals
  4. RUSE: The Girl Scout Sex Guide
  5. TURNER: Our lawbreaking Congress
More Top Stories »
  1. Voight, tea party groups plan last-minute protest
  2. PRUDEN: Into the twilight zone
  3. EDITORIAL: WWII: The most racist generation
  4. WOLF: Obama family health care fracas
  5. STEYN: 'Deemocracy' in action

Most Commented

  1. KUHNER: Impeach the president?
  2. Obama backs plan to legalize illegals
  3. Gitmo suspects allowed laptops
  4. Voight, tea party groups plan last-minute protest
  5. EDITORIAL: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow
More Top Stories »
  1. Key Democrat Boccieri switches to 'yes' on health vote
  2. Democrats make final push on health care
  3. EDITORIAL: WWII: The most racist generation
  4. Health-vote ally Nelson to get new VA hospital for Nebraska
  5. TURNER: Our lawbreaking Congress

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Congressman claims health care bill protesters hurled racial slurs

  • Belief Blog

    Nancy Pelosi invokes the 'wrong' St. Joseph

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.