Outside interests color CAFTA decision

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

The House vote on the Central American Free Trade Agreement Wednesday night had something to do with Central American trade.

But issues surrounding China, immigration policy, the sugar and textile industries, pet projects in the highway and energy bills, and a major effort by the Bush administration to sell CAFTA as a national security issue finally swayed doubtful Republicans to approve the pact.

"CAFTA was always more about China and immigration than it was anything to do with these Central American countries," said House Majority Whip Roy Blunt, Missouri Republican.

CAFTA binds the United States, Dominican Republic, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua to a set of trade and investment rules.

The House voted 217-215 in favor of the pact during a roll call scheduled to run 15 minutes but that instead lasted more than an hour, starting late Tuesday and finishing Wednesday.

The decision came down to the wire, with eight Republican holdouts stalling the vote as minutes ticked by, while House Republican leaders and White House officials, including the president, pressed the lawmakers to vote yes.

Democrats accused Republicans of swapping pork-barrel projects and political perks for votes, including consideration on farm subsidies, avoiding concessions at World Trade Organization talks, and rules on exporting to Cuba.

"They made so many side deals that American taxpayers will be paying for CAFTA for years to come," said Rep. Sherrod Brown, Ohio Democrat.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, said Republican leaders approached some Democrats to try to win their votes with offers that "didn't sound like it passed legal muster to me."

Republicans discounted Mrs. Pelosi's accusation.