- NYT’s David Brooks: Obama has ‘manhood problem’ in Middle East
- Ted Cruz thanks Obama for denying visas to terrorists
- Survivors recall chaos, fear in Everest avalanche
- General Mills apologizes for ‘right to sue’ confusion, reverses policy
- Dealer wanted in U.S. for art fraud nabbed in Spain
- Easter morning delivery for space station
- Boxer Rubin ‘Hurricane’ Carter dies at 76
- Probe could complicate Rick Perry’s prospects
- Ukraine, Russia trade blame for eastern shootout
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
TV news colored by dose of PR
Chances are most TV viewers don’t realize some of the news stories they see are produced not by journalists, but by public relations agents who work for big businesses and the government.
TV stations sometimes air video news releases (VNRs), prepackaged stories that look like real news reports, but are really designed to promote a corporate or government agenda.
In other cases, TV reporters incorporate video footage, or “B-roll,” from outside sources into their stories. Reports about the space shuttle, for example, sometimes include NASA-produced footage of the vessel blasting into orbit.
The apparent lack of disclosure when airing VNRs has helped compound questions about the integrity of broadcast journalism at a time when the line between advertising departments and TV newsrooms are increasingly blurred.
Federal regulators and lawmakers are trying to figure out if viewers should be told when they see material during a newscast that has been prepared by outsiders.
If you think it’s an easy call, think again.
The Federal Communications Commission requires broadcasters to label VNRs only if the station has been paid to air it or if it deals with political or other contentious matters.
The agency collected public input on its regulations last week. It received only nine responses, primarily from executives and trade groups from the broadcasting and public relations industries, who said further regulation isn’t needed.
The Radio-Television News Directors Association, a group that represents top newsroom managers, submitted a 13-page statement that said few TV stations air VNRs, and those that do almost always identify the source.
The association based its position on an informal survey of 100 members, according to Barbara Cochran, the group’s president. Concrete data on VNR use is hard to come by, she said.
“It’s kind of like the Loch Ness Monster. Everyone talks about it, but not many people have actually seen it,” Ms. Cochran said.
The hardest data seem to come from the Project for Excellence in Journalism, a nonpartisan media research group that asked 103 TV news directors about VNRs in 2002.
Sixty-six percent said they never use them. Of the other 34 percent, 10 percent said they always label VNRs, but the remaining 24 percent said they labeled them either “occasionally,” “rarely” or “never.”
Sen. Ted Stevens, Alaska Republican, chairman of the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, has suggested the input the FCC receives will help him determine what to do with a bill that would require the agencies to label VNRs as government productions.
The Government Accountability Office, Congress’ investigative arm, slapped the Bush administration in February for distributing VNRs that violated rules on covert propaganda.
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- WILLIAMS: Bill Maher, comedian or bigot?
- NYT's David Brooks: Obama has 'manhood problem' in Middle East
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.