


Some of the harshest Democratic critics of President Bush’s Iraq policy have grudgingly admitted that it has helped spark a growing desire for democracy in the Middle East.
Democrats aren’t taking to the Senate floor to praise Mr. Bush’s role in the spectacle of Lebanese protesters demanding independence from Syrian control, or the elections in Iraq, or the news that Saudi Arabia and Egypt have committed to freer elections.
But many critics of the war — which Lebanese democrats cite as a turning point in their cause — are slowly admitting that the president may have done the right thing in quickly taking out Saddam Hussein in 2003.
Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg, the New Jersey Democrat who delivered a famous “chicken hawk” speech deriding the war advocates in the Bush administration and voted against funding the war, said yesterday that recent developments in Lebanon and Syria suggest the war was a force for good.
“The war gave the Lebanese the spine they needed,” Mr. Lautenberg said yesterday. “It told them, ‘We can get rid of these vultures.’”
Sen Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, said on ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday that Mr. Bush deserves some credit for the positive developments in the still volatile region.
“What’s taken place in a number of those countries is enormously constructive,” Mr. Kennedy said. “It’s a reflection the president has been involved.”
Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, said he didn’t hear Mr. Bush’s speech yesterday on spreading freedom in the Middle East, but “if there were ever a place in the world where we need democracy, it’s in the Middle East.”
“Any breakthrough we get there, whether it’s in Lebanon or Egypt, is a step in the right direction and I support the president in that regard,” Mr. Reid said.
Asked whether Mr. Bush deserved credit for those developments, Mr. Reid said “we’ll just have to wait and see.”
But Massachusetts Democratic Sen. John Kerry, whose criticism of Mr. Bush’s Iraq policy did not translate into a presidential victory in November, said Mr. Bush deserves no credit for recent developments in the Middle East.
“An assassination made this happen,” Mr. Kerry said, referring to the car bomb that killed former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri last month. The killing has been blamed on Syria.
Mr. Kerry said any good that comes from the Iraq war does not make it the right decision.
“This was not the reason we went to war, but it’s a very good outcome,” Mr. Kerry said.
A senior Democratic Senate aide acknowledged that many in his party were surprised by recent developments in the Middle East and realized that attacking the president on the war would have less bite.
View Entire StoryBy H. Leighton Steward
Fantasy replaces reality in Obama's green economy

By Luke Rosiak - The Washington Times
When Newt Gingrich’s campaign disclosed in October it planned to pay the candidate $70,000 for ...

By David Hill - The Washington Times
The House voted Friday night to approve Gov. Martin O’Malley’s same-sex marriage bill, sending the ...

By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times
Acting with striking bipartisanship, Congress on Friday passed a full-year extension of the payroll tax ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.

How does our 50th state view D.C. politics?

Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.