You are currently viewing the printable version of this article, to return to the normal page, please click here.
The Washington Times Online Edition

Study finds press negative on Bush

Question of the Day

Who do you think, among the GOP presidential candidates, will raise the most funds?

View results

The press produced three times more negative stories about President Bush than about Sen. John Kerry during the 2004 campaign, says a study released yesterday.

"Criticism that George Bush got worse coverage than John Kerry is supported by the data," said the District-based Project for Excellence in Journalism, which produced the 617-page study with affiliates from Columbia University and three other schools.

The group analyzed coverage in 16 newspapers, four nightly newscasts, three network morning news shows, nine cable news programs and nine online news sites during a four-week period last year.

The analysis found 36 percent of campaign stories about Mr. Bush were negative and 12 percent were negative for Mr. Kerry. Although 20 percent of the Bush stories were deemed positive, the study found 30 percent of the Kerry stories positive.

"Reporters and editors in national news organizations in particular feel the press has gone too easy on the Bush administration," the study stated, noting that 55 percent of the national press said Bush coverage was not critical enough.

Only 9 percent of print and 8 percent of broadcast journalists called coverage of the Bush administration "too critical." Among conservative journalists, 53 percent said Bush coverage was too critical; among liberal journalists, the figure was 3 percent.

Among national journalists, 38 percent said they could name an "especially liberal" news organization, while 82 percent said they could name a conservative news group. Fox News Channel led the way, cited by 69 percent of the respondents.

"Most liberals don't see a liberal point of view," the analysis found, noting that 24 percent of liberal journalists could name a liberal news outlet but 79 percent could name a conservative one. Among conservative journalists, 68 percent said they could readily name both a liberal and a conservative news group.

The analysis found a "values gap on social issues" between the public and the press: 91 percent of the journalists said belief in God was "not necessary to be moral" while 88 percent said homosexuality should be accepted by society. In the public, those figures were 40 percent and 51 percent, respectively.

"News people -- especially national journalists -- are more liberal and far less conservative than the general public," the report said.

Among journalists from national print and broadcast news organizations, 34 percent described themselves as liberals; the figure is 20 percent in the general public. Only 7 percent of the national press say they're conservative, compared with 33 percent in the public.

Between 1985 and 2004, the study reports, the number of Americans who felt news organizations were politically biased rose from 49 percent to 59 percent.

The complete report can be seen at www.stateofthemedia.org.

Contact Jennifer Harper at jharper@washingtontimes.com or 202/636-3085.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Antonya Huntenburg, 21, of Hillsborough, N.J., a student at the Corcoran College of Art and Design, says everyone she knows is under some kind of economic pressure, including her parents. She says she joined the Occupy D.C. encampment on McPherson Square "to be safe." (Rod Lamkey Jr./The Washington Times)

    Youths show economic frustration in streets around the world

    By Patrice Hill - The Washington Times

  • **FILE** Chief Warrant Officer Charlie Morgan attends the OutServe Armed Forces Leadership Summit on Oct. 15, 2011, in Las Vegas. (Associated Press)

    Military gay group growing, aiming for more rights

    By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times

  • ** FILE ** The Rev. William E. Lori, Roman Catholic bishop of Bridgeport, Conn., gestures while testifying on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 16, 2012, before the House Oversight and Government Reform committee hearing: "Lines Crossed: Separation of Church and State. Has the Obama Administration Trampled on Freedom of Religion & Freedom of Conscience." From left are, Lori, the Rev. Dr. Matthew C. Harrison, president of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod, and C. Ben Mitchell, professor of Moral Philosophy Union University. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

    Battle lines are drawn over whether Obama is waging a war on religion

    By Cheryl Wetzstein - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Omkara World

          Empowering mind/body/spirit and health dialogue along with cutting-edge, conscious social, political, and world commentary with Adam Omkara. Join the Evolution!

          Legally Speaking

          Despite cynicism about the law, it can provide you justice, protection, and ensure your rights.